Mesh-independent discrete numerical representations of cohesive-zone models

200 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Cracking node method for dynamic fracture with finite elements (2009, unknown): “A similar approach was introduced by Remmers et al. [37] and de Borst et al. [ 38 ].”
A phase‐field model for cohesive fracture (2013, methodology): “Remeshing techniques [3, 4] and advanced discretisation techniques such as meshless methods [5] or partition-of-unity based finite element methods [6, 7, 8, 9, 10] can overcome these limitations.”
A scalable 3D fracture and fragmentation algorithm based on a hybrid, discontinuous Galerkin, Cohesive Element Method (2011, methodology): “the embedded localization line method (26), (27; 28), the extended finite element method (XFEM) (29; 30; 31), and the cohesive segments method (32; 33)).”
On generation of lumped mass matrices in partition of unity based methods (2017, background): “[20] also experienced the critical time step problem with discontinuous enrichment.”
An XFEM/CZM based inverse method for identification of composite failure parameters (2015, background): “The CZM has proven its efficiency in crack propagation modelling [5–7].”