The Social Construction of Intellectual Disability

278 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

‘You Couldn't Say “No”, Could You?’: Young Men's Understandings of Sexual Refusal (2006, background): “See Rapley (2004) and Simmons-Mackie and Damico (1999) for a detailed discussion”
“If a girl doesn't say ‘no’…”: young men, rape and claims of ‘insufficient knowledge’ (2008, background): “…so powerful is that it is based in what Sacks (1992) describes as Type 1 (‘natural’) causality (e.g. if you touch the stove [then] youwill burn your hand)when in practice Type 2 (‘moral’) causality (e.g. if you are insincere [then] no-one will love you) is operative (Sacks, 1992; Rapley, 2004).”
Promoting choice and control in residential services for people with learning disabilities (2008, background): “…through discussing obstacles and positive and negative outcomes of certain courses of action (see, for example, Antaki et al. 2002, 2006; Jingree, Finlay, and Antaki 2006; Rapley 2004) However, conceiving of a person with learning disabilities as having a fixed identity can also be disempowering.”