Why don't software developers use static analysis tools to find bugs?
By Brittany Johnson, Yoonki Song, Emerson R. Murphy-Hill, Robert W. Bowdidge. International Conference on Software Engineering, 2013
760 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computer Networks and Communications, Information Systems
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/060cc5c0fa6bed9a39bdb6f9c995586f4709006e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computer Networks and Communications
- Sebastian Proksch
- Sarah Nadi
- Sven Amann
- Mira Mezini
- Michael Pradel
- Claire Le Goues
- Abhik Roychoudhury
- Yangruibo Ding
In Information Systems
- Sebastian Proksch
- Sarah Nadi
- Abhik Roychoudhury
- Sven Amann
- Claire Le Goues
- Baishakhi Ray
- Yangruibo Ding
- Mira Mezini
Citations in the corpus
- Automated program repair (2019, background): “sis are becoming increasingly popular as quality gates in many companies.(7,23) Testing, at multiple levels of system ab-”
- Deep Learning Based Vulnerability Detection: Are We There Yet? (2020, background): “Although studies report some limited case studies on such on finding vulnerabilities in real-world projects, these case studies do not shed light on the false positives and false negatives [1].”
- A Study of Visual Studio Usage in Practice (2016, background): “4) A discussion of opportunities to advance the research in IDEs and developer-assistance tools.”
- CoQuIR: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Code Quality-Aware Information Retrieval (2025, unknown): “To address this gap, we introduce C ode Qu ality-aware I nformation R etrieval ( CoQuIR ), a benchmark specifically tailored for quality-aware code retrieval.”