A Study of Visual Studio Usage in Practice
By Sven Amann, Sebastian Proksch, Sarah Nadi, Mira Mezini. 2016
91 citations recorded by the source corpus.
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Bogdan Vasilescu
- Eirini Kalliamvakou
- Georgios Gousios
- Frank F. Xu
- Graham Neubig
- Maliheh Izadi
- Roberta Gismondi
- Albert Ziegler
Citations in the corpus
- CodeFill: Multi-token Code Completion by Jointly learning from Structure and Naming Sequences (2022, background): “It helps developers finish their programming tasks faster by decreasing the typing effort and saving keystrokes, correcting typographical errors, and enabling them to explore APIs in a context-sensitive manner [5].”
- In-IDE Code Generation from Natural Language: Promise and Challenges (2021, methodology): “With the recent advances in machine learning and deep learning, example tools like IntelliCode37 for Visual Studio, Codota38 and TabNine39 present AI-assisted code-suggestion and code-completion based on the current source code context, learned from abundant amounts of projects over the Internet.”
- Productivity assessment of neural code completion (2022, background): “1 Introduction Code completion systems that offer suggestions to a developer on the basis of contextual information from the IDE have been shown to be by far the most frequently used kind of programmer assistance [1].”
- SmartPaste: Learning to Adapt Source Code (2017, unknown): “This is a common scenario in software development [4], when developers copy a piece of code from a website ( e.g. StackOverflow) or from an existing project into a new context.”