When is growth pro-poor? Evidence from a panel of countries

594 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Have Economic Growth And Institutional Quality Contributed To Poverty And Inequality Reduction In Asia (2013, background): “Among the remedies for improving the poverty situation is economic growth, which has been widely cited as being significant in improving the lives of the poor [1-4].”
The world's most deprived: Characteristics and causes of extreme poverty and hunger (2007, unknown): “28 Ravallion 2001, Fields 2001, Dollar and Kraay 2002, Kraay 2006.”
The pattern of growth and poverty reduction in China (2009, background): “2 A partial list of contributions includes World Bank (1990, 2000), Ravallion (1995, 2001), Ravallion and Chen (1997), Fields (2001) and Kraay (2006).”
A global count of the extreme poor in 2012: data issues, methodology and initial results (2015, unknown): “47 Kraay (2006) shows that growth is one of the key sources of poverty reduction.”
Pro-poor Growth: WARR - PRO-POOR GROWTH (2005, background): “Growth may not be pro-poor because to start with there is no growth at all or it is extremely low for it to have a dent on poverty (Kraay, 2003).”
Does economic globalisation affect income inequality? A meta‐analysis (2020, background): “…Lopez-Cordova (2009) Keller (2010) Te Velde and Morrissey (2004) Brady and Leicht (2008) Kentor (2001) Tian et al. (2008) Bumann and Lensink (2016) Kraay (2006) Timmons (2010) Bussmann et al. (2005) Kratou and Goiaed (2016) Thalassinos et al. (2012) Calderon and Chong (2001) Kus (2012) Tridico…”