Conflict monitoring and cognitive control.

By Matthew Botvinick, Todd S. Braver, Deanna M. Barch, Cameron S. Carter, J. Cohen. Psychology Review, 2001

7,045 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/05b199fc0e63bc3a7975f9112b79fa0d21bd3161

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Emotion and the Prefrontal Cortex: An Integrative Review (2017, background): “…cortex) supports a performance monitoring function and detects response conflict and errors in service of adjusting levels of cognitive control (Botvinick et al., 2001; Brown & Braver, 2005; Holroyd & Coles, 2002; Ridderinkhof, Ullsperger, Crone, & Nieuwenhuis, 2004; Ullsperger & von Cramon,…”
Toward an evolutionary social neuroscience of religion (2011, methodology): “While past research has linked the ERN with both error monitoring (eg, Botvinick, Braver, Barch, Carter, & Cohen, 2001 ) and motivation (Hajcak, Moser, Yeung, & Simons, 2005), both of which contribute to better task performance, we do not think that a lower ERN among those who are highly religious ”
Dopamine in motivational control: rewarding, aversive, and alerting (2010, background): “…neural systems for cognitive control and action selection—we need to engage working memory to hold information in mind, conflict resolution to decide upon a course of action, and long-term memory to remember the resulting outcome (Bradley et al., 1992; Botvinick et al., 2001; Savine et al., 2010).”
Why do beliefs about intelligence influence learning success? A social cognitive neuroscience model. (2006, background): “The role of monitoring for goal-conflicting information has typically been ascribed to regions of anterior cingulate cortex (ACC; Botvinick et al., 2001; Ridderinkhof et al., 2004), and indeed, interactions between ACC and frontal-parietal regions have been proposed by functional magnetic resonance…”
The physics of optimal decision making: a formal analysis of models of performance in two-alternative forced-choice tasks. (2006, methodology): “, Botvinick et al., 1999; Gratton et al., 1988; Kerns et al., 2004; Laming, 1979). It is also possible other mechanisms may be involved in behavioral adaptation. For example, we have shown that simple alternation and repetition detectors, using exponentially decaying averages of prior response histo”
Separating semantic conflict and response conflict in the Stroop task: A functional MRI study (2005, background): “The ACC is often thought to detect the presence of conflict and alert other systems to exert control (Botvinick et al., 2001; Van Veen and Carter, 2002a), while the PPC is often thought to represent task-relevant stimulus-response mappings or stimulusresponse transformations or to be involved in…”
Should I stay or should I go? How the human brain manages the trade-off between exploitation and exploration (2007, background): “…to pain, negative feedback, errors in performance, conflicts in processing and even mental effort, all of which represent or are indicative of various forms of cost (e.g. Miltner et al. 1997; Carter et al. 1998; Peyron et al. 2000; Botvinick et al. 2001; Holroyd & Coles 2002; Yeung et al. 2004).”
Brain imaging of the central executive component of working memory. (2002, background): “Lateral (prefrontal and parietal) areas of the cortex should be then activated to provide control operations, which might include increasing or inhibiting neural activity within distinct brain areas (see also [16] for a similar interpretation).”