The invertebrate fauna on broom, Cytisus scoparius, in two native and two exotic habitats
By J. Memmott, S. Fowler, Q. Paynter, Andrew W. Sheppard, P. Syrett. 2000
175 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Insect Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/05a11054ce6b000e79470b590ac56b72b1724abe
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- W. H. van der Putten
- R. Callaway
- Petr Pyšek
- E. Siemann
- A. Ricciardi
- J. Klironomos
- Kurt O. Reinhart
- O. Bossdorf
In Insect Science
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
- W. H. van der Putten
- R. Callaway
- Petr Pyšek
- E. Siemann
- Jianwen Zou
- D. Richardson
- H. MacIsaac
- J. Klironomos
Citations in the corpus
- Plant-soil biota interactions and spatial distribution of black cherry in its native and invasive ranges (2003, background): “Half of these have used descriptive surveys to compare the above-ground enemies of plants in their native and invaded ranges ( Memmott et al. 2000; Wolfe 2002; Mitchell & Power 2003), and the other half have used manipulative experiments to test the effect of pathogens (Beckstead & Parker 2003), in”
- Invasive plants and their escape from root herbivory: a worldwide comparison of the root-feeding nematode communities of the dune grass Ammophila arenaria in natural and introduced ranges (2005, background): “…hypothesis), (2) A. arenaria has more specialist feeders (i.e. sedentary, endoparasitic nematodes) than in the introduced range (Jobin et al. 1996; Memmott et al. 2000; the feeding-specialist hypothesis), and that (3) in its introduced range, A. arenaria has fewer root-feeding nematode taxa than…”
- The invasive shrub Buddleja davidii performs better in its introduced range (2007, background): “Decreased herbivore attack in the invasive range has also been revealed by several other studies (Memmott et al., 2000; Wolfe, 2002; Dewalt et al., 2004; Prati & Bossdorf, 2004; Vilà et al., 2005).”
- Increased competitive ability and herbivory tolerance in the invasive plant Sapium sebiferum (2008, background): “Indeed, the EICA hypothesis prediction was primarily based on the assumption that invasive plants are mostly released from specialist herbivores in their introduced range (Blossey and No ¨tzold 1995; Memmott et al. 2000; Keane and Crawley 2002; DeWalt et al. 2004).”
- Can Invasive Species Facilitate Native Species? Evidence of How, When, and Why These Impacts Occur (2006, background): “Invasive plants are also be exploited for their leaves and nectar by native phytophages and pollinators (Memmott et al. 2000; Richardson et al. 2000; Memmott and Waser 2002).”
- Is invasion success explained by the enemy release hypothesis (2004, background): “Of these, Fenner & Lee (2001) surveyed only the incidence of a seed predator, while Memmott et al. (2000) examined diversity and biomass of enemies without measuring their impact.”
- Phenotypic and genetic differentiation between native and introduced plant populations (2005, background): “So far one study alone (Memmott et al. 2000) has distinguished between specialist and generalist herbivores and found only the specialists to be fewer in the introduced range.”
- Species richness of herbivores on exotic host plants increases with time since introduction of the host (2008, background): “Many studies have shown that endophagous insects are rare on introduced hosts (Strong et al., 1984, and references within; Fraser, 1997; Memmott et al., 2000; Cripps et al., 2006).”
- Insects on Plants: Diversity of Herbivore Assemblages Revisited (2005, background): “…herbivores can assemble rapidly on novel hosts (Kennedy & Southwood 1984, Strong et al. 1977), whereas endophages may be slower colonizers (Strong et al. 1984), and specialized guilds, such as seed-feeders, may be missing on recently arrived plant species (Memmott et al. 2000, Zwölfer 1988).”
- Comparing Invasive Plants from Their Native and Exotic Range: What Can We Learn for Biological Control?1 (2004, background): “…but one (Sheppard et al. 1996), herbivory was reduced in the Volume 18, Invasive Weed Symposium 2004 1537 exotic range, indicated through a reduction in percentage of attack, lower phytophagous species numbers, or reduced herbivore loads, for example reduced herbivore biomass (Memmott et al. 2000).”
- SOIL BIOTA FACILITATE EXOTIC ACER INVASIONS IN EUROPE AND NORTH AMERICA (2004, background): “However, these studies suggest that fewer natural enemies are present in invaded ranges than in natural ranges (Memmott et al. 2000, Wolfe 2002, Mitchell and Power 2003, 1738 KURT O. REINHART AND RAGAN M. CALLAWAY Ecological Applications Vol. 14, No. 6 but see Beckstead and Parker 2003).”
- ENEMY RELEASE? AN EXPERIMENT WITH CONGENERIC PLANT PAIRS AND DIVERSE ABOVE- AND BELOWGROUND ENEMIES (2005, background): “2979 Key words: biotic resistance hypothesis; congeneric pairs; Darwin’s naturalization hypothesis; enemy escape; herbivory; insect diversity; invasion biology; phylogenetic approaches to community ecology; plant—insect interactions; plant—virus interactions; soil microbial feedback.”
- Root exudate is allelopathic in invaded community but not in native community: field evidence for the novel weapons hypothesis (2009, background): “In many cases, exotic species that form near monocultures in their invaded range are much rarer in their native communities (Lonsdale & Segura 1987; Braithwaite et al . 1989; Malecki et al . 1993; Eckert et al . 1996; Meyer & Florence 1996; Bruce et al . 1997; Paynter et al . 1998; Memmott et al . ”