An evaluation of the relationship between Gray’s revised RST and Eysenck’s PEN: Distinguishing BIS and FFFS in Carver and White’s BIS/BAS scales

By Nadja Heym, Eamonn Ferguson, C. Lawrence. 2008

253 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0561a35d86b9f2b8bb0049dde87948f89df33e9f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

In Clinical Psychology

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Psychometric evaluation of the behavioral inhibition/behavioral activation system scales and the sensitivity to punishment and sensitivity to reward questionnaire in a sample of eating disordered patients (2009, unknown): “The second five-factor model is identical to the just described model, except the item ‘If I think something unpleasant is going to happen, I usually get pretty worked up’ is switched from the BISAnxiety factor to the FFFS-Fear factor (Heym et al., 2008), in correspondence to the suggestion of Corr ”
Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory and emotion regulation difficulties: A multimodal investigation (2010, background): “Finally, given evidence of gender differences in BIS–FFFS and BAS (Heym et al., 2008) and ER (Gratz & Roemer, 2004), as well as findings that gender moderates the association between ER and maladaptive outcomes (Gratz et al.”
Sensitivity of Gray’s behavioral inhibition system in clinically anxious and non-anxious children and adolescents (2010, methodology): “Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), run with the sem-package of R (R Development Core Team, 2009), was used to test the Heym et al. (2008) two-factor model.”
Validation of the Measure of Revised Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory Constructs (2014, methodology): “In order to apply the scale for this purpose, BIS scale has been split into measures of BIS and Fear (Heym et al., 2008; Keiser & Ross, 2011), while item content has not been modified.”
Carver and Whites' BIS/FFFS/BAS scales and domains and facets of the Five Factor Model of personality (2011, background): “In addition, a factor contributing to reduced discriminability of the BIS and FFFS in this study is low internal consistency, largely a function of the short scale lengths of these measures (Heym et al., 2008).”