Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory and emotion regulation difficulties: A multimodal investigation
By Matthew T. Tull, K. L. Gratz, Robert D. Latzman, Nathan A. Kimbrel, C. Lejuez. 2010
145 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d5013ed7d15dc62873796e80f45dc1a6a9a07baf
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Applied Psychology
In Clinical Psychology
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
Citations in the corpus
- An Examination of the Latent Structure of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (2012, unknown): “Moreover, using adult samples, both Tull et al. (2007) and Tull et al. (2010) found that DERS-AWARENESS failed to correlate with four of the five DERS subscales (i.e., NONACCEPTANCE, GOALS, IMPULSE, STRATEGIES), but the other five DERS subscales all correlated significantly with one another.”
- Development and Validation of a Brief Version of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale: The DERS-16 (2015, result): “Findings that none of the items from the lack of emotional awareness subscale was retained on the basis of the item-total correlations are consistent with past research indicating that this subscale is less strongly associated with the overall DERS score than the other subscales (Neumann, van Lier, ”