Probiotics and phytogenics for poultry: myth or reality?

By T. Applegate, V. Klose, T. Steiner, A. Ganner, G. Schatzmayr. 2010

183 citations recorded by the source corpus.

SUMMARY Removal and restriction of subtherapeutic antibiotics from poultry diets in many parts of the world has amplified interest in improving intestinal health and nutrient utilization. Some probiotic (direct-fed microbials) and plant-derived (phytogenic) feed additives are gaining market presence. Defined probiotic cultures have the potential to succeed, in large part because of in vitro screening and selection. However, regulatory approval delays, particularly in Europe, have stymied the commercial application of some microorganisms in poultry diets. Phytogenic feed additives have demonstrated ranges of antimicrobial activities in vitro and are building a track record of improvements in bird performance. Hesitation by nutritionists to incorporate these feed additives are due in part to 1) unfamiliarity, 2) the overselling of plausible effects by industry, 3) product inconsistency, 4) a lack of documented physiological and microbiological effects in vivo, and, in the case of probiotics, 5) a lack of documentation of persistence.

Subfields: Animal Science and Zoology, Food Science, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/05054ce8fe487058c8cde4e6e71dcfce9bfd633f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Animal Science and Zoology

  1. H. Lillehoj

In Food Science

  1. H. Lillehoj

Citations in the corpus