Performance measurement: from philosophy to practice

By S. Tangen. 2004

496 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management Information Systems, Management Science and Operations Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/04f1c918de3befa61f50b7f4b11b527db372d7d0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management Information Systems

1. Zineb Issor
2. Vesna Bosilj-Vuksic
3. J. Padmore
4. Mike Simpson
5. Nicki Newman
6. Omar Taouab
7. Rok Skrinjar
8. Mojca Indihar Stemberger

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. Zineb Issor
2. J. Padmore
3. Mike Simpson
4. Nicki Newman
5. Omar Taouab
6. Rok Skrinjar
7. Mojca Indihar Stemberger
8. A. Nikpour

Citations in the corpus

• The impact of business process orientation on financial and non-financial performance (2008, background): “There are several approaches (Tangem, 2004) to organizational performance measurement that encompass different stakeholder’s perspectives.”
• Towards a new model of success and performance in SMEs (2012, methodology): “They suggest that the relative importance of financial and non-financial performance indicators may vary according to the stage in the life of the organisation, a point also made by Walker et al. (1999). Even when appropriate measures have been identified, there is still the difficulty of collecting”
• Firm Performance: Definition and Measurement Models (2019, background): “Tangen (2004) indicates that many companies still rely on the traditional quantitative financial performance measurement systems.”
• The Impact of Organizational Culture on Organizational Performance: The Mediating Role of Employee’s Organizational Commitment (2017, background): “Organizational performance includes effectiveness, efficiency, productivity, quality, and innovation (Tangen, 2004).”