Analysis of shock motion in shockwave and turbulent boundary layer interaction using direct numerical simulation data

By Minwei Wu, ÍN M.PINOMART. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2007

295 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Aerospace Engineering, Computational Mechanics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/04ee847136995e5329898df4c8eb5ebc4cbcaddd

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Aerospace Engineering

In Computational Mechanics

Citations in the corpus

Confinement effects in shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interactions through wall-modelled large-eddy simulations (2014, background): “Wu & Martin (2008), in their study of direct numerical simulations (DNS) of a compression-ramp STBLI, noted that, in accordance with Dussauge, Dupont & Debiève (2006), the Strouhal number of the low-frequency motion does not depend significantly on the Mach number and suggested that instead of an…”
Large-eddy simulation of low-frequency unsteadiness in a turbulent shock-induced separation bubble (2009, background): “For example, Wu and M artin [55] find that “the streamwise shock motion is not significantly af fected by low-momentum structures in the incoming boundary l yer”.”
Low-frequency dynamics of shock-induced separation in a compression ramp interaction (2009, result): “The inconsistency between the present study and the results of Wu & Martin (2008) could be due to the differences in the analysis techniques between the two studies.”
Low-order stochastic modelling of low-frequency motions in reflected shock-wave/boundary-layer interactions (2011, background): “Email address for correspondence: e.touber@imperial.ac.uk Maslov 2009; Ringuette et al. 2009) and numerical studies (see Wu & Martin 2008; Garnier 2009; Priebe, Wu & Martin 2009; Touber & Sandham 2009a ,b) are in agreement that the pressure fluctuations are broadband in nature and centred around a…”
Low-Frequency Unsteadiness of Shock Wave/Turbulent Boundary Layer Interactions (2014, methodology): “Priebe & Martin (2012) also specifically discussed the changes in the turbulence activity in the shear layer at different phases of the oscillation cycle, which appear to support the shear layer entrainment model of Wu & Martin (2008) and Piponniau et al. (2009).”
A simple model for low-frequency unsteadiness in shock-induced separation (2009, background): “A similar scheme has already been proposed in both subsonic and supersonic cases (Cherry et al. 1984; Dandois, Garnier & Sagaut 2007; Wu & Martin 2008); here we propose to formulize it with simple hypotheses based on the dynamics of the equilibrium mixing layer.”
Three-dimensional instantaneous structure of a shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interaction (2009, background): “As noted by Wu & Martin (2008) for instance, numerous studies † Email address for correspondence: r.a.humble@tudelft.nl have reported that the time scale of the large-scale low-frequency motion is of the order 10δ/U∞–100δ/U∞ (see e.g. Dolling 2001; Dussauge, Dupont & Debiève 2006), in contrast to…”
A scaling analysis for turbulent shock-wave/boundary-layer interactions (2013, background): “…numerical studies performed at low Reynolds numbers (Reθ ' 5 × 103) indicate that the low-frequency shock motions are related to the dynamics of the separated bubble which forms downstream of the separation shock (Dupont et al. 2006; Touber & Sandham 2008; Wu & Martin 2008; Piponniau et al. 2009).”
Unsteady effects of strong shock-wave/boundary-layer interaction at high Reynolds number (2017, background): “A similar entrainment/recharge mechanism consisting of a feedback loop between the separation bubble, the detached shear layer and the shock system is proposed by Wu & Martín (2008).”