Three-dimensional instantaneous structure of a shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interaction

By R. Humble, G. Elsinga, Fulvio Scarano, B. W. van Oudheusden. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2009

190 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Atmospheric Science, Computational Mechanics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/146779f200121997aa6e7ce5bee613a8a571e71c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Atmospheric Science

In Computational Mechanics

Citations in the corpus

Unsteady effects of strong shock-wave/boundary-layer interaction at high Reynolds number (2017, background): “The wide test section together with the full-span model (shock generator and baseplate) lead to a nearly two-dimensional SWBLI, which is demonstrated in Daub et al. (2015).”
Turbulence in supersonic boundary layers at moderate Reynolds number (2011, background): “Notable exceptions to this statement include the tomographic particle image velocimetry experimental data by Humble et al. (2009) and Elsinga et al. (2010), which provide insight into the full instantaneous three-dimensional structure of the flow field.”
Low-frequency unsteadiness in shock wave–turbulent boundary layer interaction (2012, methodology): “The present findings may be reconciled with the findings of Ganapathisubramani et al. (2007, 2009) and Humble et al. (2009a), who found significant upstream influence and concluded that the incoming boundary layer is at the origin of the low-frequency unsteadiness.”
Low-frequency dynamics of shock-induced separation in a compression ramp interaction (2009, result): “Recently, Humble et al. (2009) performed tomographic PIV in a reflected shock/boundary-layer interaction and proposed a model for the low-frequency unsteadiness that is consistent with the results presented in the current study. The authors found that instantaneous reflected shock-wave pattern confo”
Low-order stochastic modelling of low-frequency motions in reflected shock-wave/boundary-layer interactions (2011, background): “…undoubtedly affected by the passage of low- or high-speed streaks, as for instance evidenced by the tomographic particle image velocimetry study of Humble et al. (2009), the success of the mechanism studied by Ganapathisubramani et al. (2009) in explaining the low-frequency shock motions depends…”
Effects of micro-ramps on a shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interaction (2009, methodology): “position of the reflected shock foot [7,8].”
A scaling analysis for turbulent shock-wave/boundary-layer interactions (2013, background): “…shock interactions (Green 1970; Dupont, Haddad & Debiève 2006; Pirozzoli & Grasso 2006; Touber & Sandham 2008; Piponniau et al. 2009; Humble et al. 2009a; Souverein et al. 2009; Polivanov, Sidorenko & Maslov 2009; Garnier 2009; Touber & Sandham 2009a; Pirozzoli et al. 2009;…”
Three-dimensional vortex organization in a high-Reynolds-number supersonic turbulent boundary layer (2010, methodology): “…important interest in relation to shock wave turbulent boundary layer interactions with a number of studies indicating a relation between the coherent structures in the incoming boundary layer and the shock unsteadiness (e.g. Ganapathisubramani, Clemens & Dolling 2007a, Humble et al. 2009).”
Confinement effects in shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interactions through wall-modelled large-eddy simulations (2014, methodology): “Despite all the previous work devoted to the study of the low-frequency unsteadiness in STBLI, little is known about the influence (if any) of the confinement imposed by the sidewalls.”
Tomographic PIV: principles and practice (2012, methodology): “…first in the low-speed regime (Schröder et al 2008b, Elsinga et al 2007b) and later in high-Reynolds number flows (figure 22, top right) (Reθ = 40 000) and in the supersonic regime (Elsinga et al 2008, 2010a), including the case of shock-wave boundary layer interactions (Humble et al 2009).”