Detecting the Rise and Fall of 21 cm Fluctuations with the Murchison Widefield Array

By A. Lidz, Oliver Zahn, M. McQuinn, M. Zaldarriaga, L. Hernquist. 2007

159 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We forecast the sensitivity with which the Murchison Widefield Array (MWA) can measure the 21 cm power spectrum of cosmic hydrogen. The MWA is sensitive to roughly a decade in scale (wavenumbers of k ∼ 0.1-1 h Mpc−1). This amounts primarily to constraints on two numbers: the amplitude and the slope of the 21 cm power spectrum on the scales probed. We find, however, that the redshift evolution in these quantities can yield important information about reionization. We examine a range of theoretical models, spanning uncertainties in the nature of the ionizing sources and the abundance of minihalos during reionization. Although the power spectrum differs substantially among these models, a generic prediction is that the amplitude of the 21 cm power spectrum on MWA scales (k ∼ 0.4 h Mpc−1) peaks near the epoch when the intergalactic medium (IGM) is ≈50% ionized. Moreover, the slope of the 21 cm power spectrum flattens as the ionization fraction increases and the sizes of the H II regions grow. With regards to detection sensitivity, we show that the optimal MWA antenna configuration for power spectrum measurements would pack all 500 antenna tiles as closely as possible in a compact core. Detecting the characteristic redshift evolution of our models will help to confirm that observed 21 cm fluctuations originate from the IGM, and not from foregrounds, and will provide an indirect constraint on the evolution of the volume-filling factor of H II regions during reionization. After two years of observations, the MWA can constrain the filling factor at an epoch when ∼ 0.5 to within roughly ±δ ∼ 0.1 at 2 σ confidence.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/04ae9e6a5143693d569d2844da46373e4ab0d204

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. M. McQuinn
  2. A. Mesinger
  3. S. Furlanetto
  4. L. Hernquist
  5. B. Greig
  6. J. Pritchard
  7. Renyue Cen
  8. Abraham Loeb

In Nuclear and High Energy Physics

  1. A. Mesinger
  2. M. McQuinn
  3. S. Furlanetto
  4. J. Pritchard
  5. Abraham Loeb
  6. C. Carilli
  7. L. Hernquist
  8. Miguel F. Morales

Citations in the corpus