Inside-out or outside-in: the topology of reionization in the photon-starved regime suggested by Lyα forest data

By T. R. Choudhury, M. Haehnelt, J. Regan. 2008

170 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We use a set of seminumerical simulations based on the Zel'dovich approximation, the friends-of-friends algorithm and excursion set formalism to generate reionization maps of high dynamic range with a range of assumptions regarding the distribution and luminosity of ionizing sources and the spatial distribution of sinks for the ionizing radiation. We find that ignoring the inhomogeneous spatial distribution of regions of high gas density where recombinations are important - as is often done in studies of this kind - can lead to misleading conclusions regarding the topology of reionization, especially if reionization occurs in the photon-starved regime suggested by Lya forest data. The inhomogeneous spatial distribution of recombinations significantly reduces the mean-free path of ionizing photons and the typical size of coherently ionized regions. Reionization proceeds then much more as an outside-in process. Low-density regions far from ionizing sources become ionized before regions of high gas density not hosting sources of ionizing radiation. The spatial distribution of sinks of ionization radiation also significantly affects the shape and amplitude of the power spectrum of fluctuations of 21 cm emission. The slope of the 21 cm power spectrum as measured by upcoming 21 cm experiments should be able to distinguish to what extent the topology of reionization proceeds outside-in or inside-out, while the evolution of the amplitude of the power spectrum with increasing ionized mass fraction should be sensitive to the spatial distribution and the luminosity of ionizing sources.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Biophysics, Molecular Biology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5aeead5eb57ab090e5bb9bd0205b6a5f0bdb3db6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. M. McQuinn
  2. L. Hernquist
  3. Richard S. Ellis
  4. P. Hopkins
  5. J. Dunlop
  6. A. Mesinger
  7. Brant Robertson
  8. S. Furlanetto

In Biophysics

  1. A. Mesinger
  2. E. Sobacchi
  3. Joseph J. Mohr

In Molecular Biology

  1. A. Mesinger
  2. E. Sobacchi

Citations in the corpus