One‐, two‐, and three‐dimensional root water uptake functions for transient modeling
By Jasper A. Vrugt, M. V. Wijk, Jan W. Hopmans, Jirka Šimůnek. 2001
332 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Civil and Structural Engineering, Environmental Engineering, Soil Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/04a8c019388bd51c2b6780e456a7b647a19a696c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Civil and Structural Engineering
- Jasper A. Vrugt
- M. T. V. Genuchten
- Jirka Šimůnek
- Marnik Vanclooster
- M. Šejna
- Sébastien Lambot
- Willem Bouten
- Ming Ye
In Environmental Engineering
- Jasper A. Vrugt
- Ming Ye
- M. T. V. Genuchten
- Jirka Šimůnek
- M. Clark
- M. Šejna
- Hoshin V. Gupta
- Willem Bouten
In Soil Science
- Qiang Zuo
- Renduo Zhang
- Francesco Laio
- Willem Bouten
- Bruno Cheviron
- Jean-Claude Mailhol
- Rami Albasha
- Jasper A. Vrugt
Citations in the corpus
- Benchmarking test of empirical root water uptake models (2017, background): “In many one- and two-dimensional problems, macroscopic RWU is modelled as a sink term in the Richards equation, whose dependency on water content or pressure head is usually represented by simple empirical functions (e.g. Feddes et al., 1976; Feddes et al., 1978; Lai and Katul, 2000; Li et al., 2001”
- Compensatory uptake functions in empirical macroscopic root water uptake models: experimental and numerical analysis (2015, methodology): “This profile was constructed using the Vrugt et al. (2001) function, implemented in the Hydrus (2D/3D) model.”
- Validity of First-Order Approximations to Describe Parameter Uncertainty in Soil Hydrologic Models (2002, methodology): “…et al., 1998a; Romano and Santini, 1999) interdependence and model nonlinearity violate the use and from field data (Abbaspour et al., 1999; Musters and of this first-order approximation to obtain exact confiBouten, 2000; Vrugt et al., 2001b,c; among many others). dence intervals of the parameter.”
- Implementation and Application of a Root Growth Module in HYDRUS (2018, methodology): “…of the root system and implementation of the Jones et al. (1991) root growth model, a two-dimensional, root length density distribution function (Vrugt et al., 2001a, 2001b) was combined with either the Verhulst–Pearl logistic growth function or a tabulated input of rooting depths (Hartmann and…”
- A Generalized Function of Wheat's Root Length Density Distributions (2004, methodology): “The following model is often employed to simulate one- The procedure resulted in 89 data sets from 10 papers (Asseng dimensional vertical soil water flow under evaporative condi- et al., 1997; Lotfollahi et al., 1997; Anderson et al., 1998; Feng tion and in the presence of root-water uptake (van G”
- A vertically extended stochastic model of soil moisture in the root zone (2006, background): “A common feature of these representations (except the one by Vrugt et al. [2001] ) is that r(z )i s a decreasing function of z, in good accordance with the field data collected by Schenk and Jackson [2002].”
- Root Water Uptake: From Three‐Dimensional Biophysical Processes to Macroscopic Modeling Approaches (2013, unknown): “…one describes the water uptake by plant roots (S < 0) or root exudation (S > 0). his term may difer between authors in terms of dimensionality (Vrugt et al., 2001) but also in terms of complexity and degree of mechanical/biological principles explicitly accounted for (de Willigen et al.,…”
- Towards a comprehensive assessment of model structural adequacy (2012, background): “D applications [Vesselinov et al., 2001a, 2001b; Vrugt et al., 2001; Yeh et al., 2002; Vrugt et al., 2004; Ye and Khaleel, 2008; Klaus and Zehe, 2010], although more difficult than in GW due to the increased computational cost of solving variably saturated flow equations, and the challenge of…”
- On the identification of macroscopic root water uptake parameters from soil water content observations (2002, methodology): “Although recent studies clearly put forward the limitations of optimizing the root water uptake parameters from soil water content measurements by inverse modeling [see, e.g., Musters et al., 2000; Musters and Bouten, 2000] some authors succeeded in this task [e.g., Vrugt et al., 2001a, 2001b].”
- HYDRUS: Model Use, Calibration, and Validation (2012, methodology): “Vrugt et al. (2001a, 2001b) used a genetic algorithm to simultaneously identify soil hydraulic, root water uptake, and root distribution parameters, which would be very difficult, if not impossible, with the standard parameter approaches implemented in HYDRUS.”