A Comparison of Arthropod Communities in Transgenic Bt and Conventional Cotton in Australia
By M. Whitehouse, L. J. Wilson, G. Fitt. 2005
173 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Genetics, Insect Science, Molecular Biology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/04976d367183c62a01262120a30473b1df606bbe
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Genetics
In Insect Science
In Molecular Biology
Citations in the corpus
- Canopy- and Ground-Dwelling Predatory Arthropods in Commercial Bt and non-Bt Cotton Fields: Patterns and Mechanisms (2005, result): “…et al. 2000, Hagerty et al. 2000, Men et al. 2003, Wu and Guo 2003, Sisterson et al. 2004, Hagerty et al. 2005, Head et al. 2005, Naranjo 2005a, b, Whitehouse et al. 2005), but the results reported here are among the Þrst dealing with changes in plantcanopy and ground-dwelling predator…”
- Impacts of Bt crops on non-target invertebrates and insecticide use patterns (2009, background): “[60–65]), while other studies focused on particular functional guilds such as”
- Aphidophagy by Coccinellidae: Application of biological control in agroecosystems (2009, background): “, 2005, 2007a), several studies have documented no significant direct impacts of Bt crops on coccinellid populations (Naranjo, 2005; Pilcher et al., 2005; Torres and Ruberson, 2005; Whitehouse et al., 2005; Hoheisel and Fleischer, 2007).”
- Sustainable pest management for cotton production. A review (2011, background): “…diversity of arthropod populations around cotton fields, which is weak but significant in certain cases, has encouraged the pursuit of investigations in this area of whole system impacts (Head et al., 2005; Naranjo, 2005a, b; Torres et al., 2005; Vaissayre et al., 2005; Whitehouse et al., 2005).”
- A Multiyear, Large-Scale Comparison of Arthropod Populations on Commercially Managed Bt and Non-Bt Cotton Fields (2005, background): “…of three U.S. states (north and south Alabama, Georgia, and South Carolina) comparing arthropod populations on commercially managed Bt (Bollgard) and non-Bt (conventional) cotton (see also the papers in this volume by Naranjo 2005a, b, Torres and Ruberson 2005, Whitehouse et al. 2005).”
- Impact of Transgenic VIP3A × Cry1Ab Lepidopteran-resistant Field Corn on the Nontarget Arthropod Community (2005, background): “…environmental stresses (Cuppen et al. 2000, Leonard et al. 2000, Smit et al. 2002, CandolÞ et al. 2003, Dively and Rose 2003, Heegaard and Vandvik 2004, Hense et al. 2004, Koolhaas et al. 2004, Pakeman 2004, Naranjo 2005, Prasifka et al. 2005, Torres and Ruberson 2005, Whitehouse et al. 2005).”
- Effect of Bacillus thuringiensis Transgenic Corn for Lepidopteran Control on Nontarget Arthropods (2005, background): “Naranjo (2005) and Whitehouse et al. (2005) also found densities of Nabis spp. were lower in Bt cotton, most likely because of reduced availability of lepidopteran prey.”