Impact of Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction Training on Intrinsic Brain Connectivity

By Lisa A. Kilpatrick, Brandall Y. Suyenobu, Suzanne R. Smith, Joshua A. Bueller, T. Goodman, J. D. Creswell, Kirsten Tillisch, Emeran A. Mayer, Bruce D. Naliboff. NeuroImage, 2011

351 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The beneficial effects of mindful awareness and mindfulness meditation training on physical and psychological health are thought to be mediated in part through changes in underlying brain processes. Functional connectivity MRI (fcMRI) allows identification of functional networks in the brain. It has been used to examine state-dependent activity and is well-suited for studying states such as meditation. We applied fcMRI to determine if Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) training is effective in altering intrinsic connectivity networks (ICNs). Healthy women were randomly assigned to participate in an 8 week Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) training course or an 8 week waiting period. After 8 weeks, fMRI data (1.5 T) was acquired while subjects rested with eyes closed, with the instruction to pay attention to the sounds of the scanner environment. Group independent component analysis was performed to investigate training-related changes in functional connectivity. Significant MBSR-related differences in functional connectivity were found mainly in auditory/salience and medial visual networks. Relative to findings in the control group, MBSR subjects showed (1) increased functional connectivity within auditory and visual networks, (2) increased functional connectivity between auditory cortex and areas associated with attentional and self-referential processes, (3) greater anticorrelation between auditory and visual cortex, and (4) greater anticorrelation between visual cortex and areas associated with attentional and self-referential processes. These findings suggest that 8 weeks of mindfulness meditation training alters intrinsic functional connectivity in ways that may reflect a more consistent attentional focus, enhanced sensory processing, and reflective awareness of sensory experience.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/04858201eec68af828cc2ed9ba1142cb725bbb98

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

  1. David R. Vago
  2. Barbara L. Fredrickson
  3. David Silbersweig
  4. Eric L. Garland
  5. Philippe R. Goldin
  6. N. Farb
  7. Katherine A Bonus
  8. Judson A. Brewer

In Cognitive Neuroscience

  1. David R. Vago
  2. Barbara L. Fredrickson
  3. David Silbersweig
  4. Judson A. Brewer
  5. Richard J. Davidson
  6. Hedy Kober
  7. Philippe R. Goldin
  8. Yi-Yuan Tang

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

  1. Barbara L. Fredrickson
  2. Eric L. Garland
  3. Philippe R. Goldin
  4. N. Farb
  5. David R. Vago
  6. David Silbersweig
  7. Richard J. Davidson
  8. Hedy Kober

Citations in the corpus