All-cause mortality associated with physical activity during leisure time, work, sports, and cycling to work.

By L. B. Andersen, P. Schnohr, M. Schroll, H. Hein. Archives of Internal Medicine, 2000

1,075 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, General Health Professions, Physiology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/045a96e858c80db65302043dd83d3a89f880b1be

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

1. Adrian Bauman
2. Audrey de Nazelle
3. A. Rabl
4. S. Blair

In General Health Professions

1. Adrian Bauman
2. H. Rutter
3. Audrey de Nazelle
4. James F. Sallis
5. A. Rabl
6. K. Leyden
7. M. Nieuwenhuijsen

In Physiology

1. Adrian Bauman
2. James F. Sallis
3. Audrey de Nazelle
4. A. Rabl
5. S. Handy
6. S. Blair
7. Nikos Ntoumanis
8. L. Frank

Citations in the corpus

• Improving health through policies that promote active travel: a review of evidence to support integrated health impact assessment. (2011, background): “The first large scale prospective study found that bike commuting in Copenhagen could reduce the risk of premature mortality by approximately one third (Andersen et al., 2000).”
• Is physical activity or physical fitness more important in defining health benefits? (2001, methodology): “, 1999 (8) N 5 472 elderly Dutch men Observational cohort study Surveys taken in 1985 and 1990 Self-reported physical activity Categories based on tertiles of time spent on physical activity: (1) Low (2) Middle (3) High Age, disease, functional status, and lifestyle factors adjusted in 1990 All-caus”
• Health benefits of cycling: a systematic review (2011, background): “One of the most-cited prospective cycling studies reported pooled data from three epidemiological surveys from Copenhagen, Denmark (Andersen et al., 2000).”
• Updating the evidence that physical activity is good for health: an epidemiological review 2000-2003. (2004, background): “Recent studies reported here have suggested that walking, especially brisk walking (at least 3.2-4.8 km per hour), itself confers a benefit which is independent of other modes of PA. Active commuting is supported by a few studies( 7 ), but evidence in this area remains sparse.”
• Health impact assessment of active transportation: A systematic review. (2015, methodology): “On the one hand, studies show independent health benefits from PA gained by AT, even after adjusting for other domains of PA (Andersen et al., 2000; Matthews et al., 2007; Hamer and Chida, 2008; Kelly et al., 2014).”
• Contribution of public parks to physical activity. (2007, background): “Given the growing consensus that the environment plays a key role in promoting energy expenditure, expanding opportunities to increase physical activity is a promising means of addressing sedentary behaviors associated with a variety of chronic illness.(4,5) Fewer than half of all Americans regularl”
• Benefits of shift from car to active transport (2012, methodology): “The authors of this report carried out a thorough review of health benefits of bicycling and concluded that it would be best to consider only mortality, using as basis a large epid miological study of cyclists in Copenhagen [Andersen et al 2000].”
• Bike-sharing: History, Impacts, Models of Provision, and Future (2009, background): “The public health benefits of bike-sharing have yet to be analyzed; however, the health benefits of cycling are well-known (Andersen et al. 2000; Cavill and Davis 2006; Shepard 2008).”
• Risk of injury for bicycling on cycle tracks versus in the street (2011, background): “Bicycling could address obesity, cancer, stroke, diabetes, asthma, mortality and pollution;”