Drawing out emotions: the use of participant-produced drawings in qualitative inquiry
By Kerri S. Kearney, Adrienne E. Hyle. 2004
295 citations recorded by the source corpus.
In this article we outline the use of participant-produced drawings as part of a larger study that examined the emotional impact of change on individuals in an educational institution (Kearney, 2002; Kearney and Hyle, 2003). Both the participants’and the researchers’perspectives on the drawing methodology, as used in this study, provide the foundation for our findings that drawings: 1) create a path toward feelings and emotions, 2) lead to a more succinct presentation of participant experiences, 3) require additional verbal interpretation by the participant for accuracy, 4) are unpredictable as a tool for encouraging participation in the research, 5) combat researcher biases when left unstructured, 6) are affected by the amount of researcher-imposed structure in the scope of how they could be interpreted, and 7) help to create triangulation of study data.
Subfields: Sociology and Political Science, Speech and Hearing, Visual Arts and Performing Arts
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0436130e5ed8616fc354bafe99251675908f37e8
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Sociology and Political Science
In Speech and Hearing
In Visual Arts and Performing Arts
Citations in the corpus
- Narratives at work: the development of career identity (2012, background): “…proposed by Schön (1993), the concept of generative processes by analogical transfer expounded by Finke (1994), and Black’s (1993) argument that metaphors can generate new knowledge and insight by changing relationships between the things designated (see also Kearney & Hyle, 2004; Leitch, 2006).”
- Making the familiar strange: can visual research methods render the familiar setting more perceptible? (2010, unknown): “Auteur theory is required on a practical level because the interpretation of the audience is not necessarily the same as the narrative the image-maker wanted to communicate; indeed it can often be markedly different (Kearney and Hyle 2004).”