Detecting Deception: The Benefit of Looking at a Combination of Behavioral, Auditory and Speech Content Related Cues in a Systematic Manner

By Aldert Vrij, Samantha Mann. 2004

93 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0433e643a2790a8efdac826dbbd9cba5235b7d3e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Leanne ten Brinke
2. S. Porter
3. Chantal Gustaw

In Social Psychology

1. Leanne ten Brinke
2. S. Porter
3. Chantal Gustaw

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Leanne ten Brinke
2. S. Porter

Citations in the corpus

• The truth about lies: What works in detecting high‐stakes deception? (2010, background): “For example, critical thinking errors, a reliance on false stereotypes, and the influence of schemas can influence judicial decisions (e.g. Stromwall & Granhag, 2003; Vrij, 2000, 2004; Vrij & Mann, 2004).”
• Dangerous decisions: the impact of first impressions of trustworthiness on the evaluation of legal evidence and defendant culpability (2010, background): “Further, judges are susceptible to critical thinking errors and a reliance on false stereotypes that may be cited to justify their initial, unreliable assessment (e.g. Granhag & Strömwall, 2004; Vrij & Mann, 2004; Vrij, 2004, 2008).”
• Why professionals fail to catch liars and how they can improve (2004, unknown): “…shown that more accurate truth/lie decisions can be made when both speech content and nonverbal behaviour are taken into account instead of just speech content or just nonverbal communication (Vrij, Edward, Roberts, & Bull, 2000; Vrij, Akehurst, Soukara, & Bull, 2004; Vrij & Mann, 2004).”