Deviation measures of linguistic preference relations in group decision making
By Zeshui Xu. 2005
733 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computational Theory and Mathematics, Management Science and Operations Research
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/041d85571e7ae51273d4cd6250df6335a6395596
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computational Theory and Mathematics
- Zeshui Xu
- Francisco Herrera
- Enrique Herrera-Viedma
- Huchang Liao
- Luis Martínez-López
- Francisco Chiclana
- Xiao-Jun Zeng
- Zhiming Zhang
In Management Science and Operations Research
- Zeshui Xu
- Francisco Herrera
- Huchang Liao
- Enrique Herrera-Viedma
- Francisco Chiclana
- Luis Martínez-López
- Xiao-Jun Zeng
- Zhiming Zhang
Citations in the corpus
- Some Hesitant Fuzzy Aggregation Operators with Their Application in Group Decision Making (2011, methodology): “…several tools have been developed, such as fuzzy set (Zadeh 1965), interval-valued fuzzy set (Zadeh 1975), linguistic fuzzy set (Herrera et al. 1996; Xu 2004, 2005), type-2 fuzzy set (Dubois and Prade 1980; Miyamoto 2005), which allow the degree of an element to a set denoted by the fuzzy number,…”
- Applying fuzzy linguistic preference relations to the improvement of consistency of fuzzy AHP (2008, background): “Generally, these preference relations can be categorized into multiplicative preference relations [15,19,44], fuzzy preference relations [1,8–10,13,15,24,38,41–47] and linguistic preference relations [17,18,20–23,25,26,48–50,52].”
- Consistency-based risk assessment with probabilistic linguistic preference relation (2016, methodology): “To overcome this issue of 1 { | 0,1, , } S s , Xu [18] extended the additive linguistic evaluation scale and gave a subscript-symmetric linguistic evaluation scale: 2 { | , , 1,0,1, , } S s , where the mid linguistic label 0 s represents an assessment of “indifference”, and w”
- A minimum adjustment cost feedback mechanism based consensus model for group decision making under social network with distributed linguistic trust (2018, background): “For instance, Xu [51] proposed a continuous linguistic model as: Let S = {sα |α = −t, .”
- Qualitative decision making with correlation coefficients of hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets (2015, methodology): “A subscript-symmetric additive linguistic term set [32] is shown as: S 1⁄4 fstjt 1⁄4 s; .”
- Hesitant fuzzy power aggregation operators and their application to multiple attribute group decision making (2013, background): “Several classical extensions of the concept have been developed, including the interval-valued fuzzy set [37,64], intuitionistic fuzzy set [2,3,23,25], intervalvalued intuitionistic fuzzy set [4,22,41], linguistic fuzzy set [46,48], type-2 fuzzy set [5,10,12–14,30,66], type-n fuzzy set [10], and fuz”
- Hesitant fuzzy multi-attribute decision making based on TOPSIS with incomplete weight information (2013, methodology): “Many methods for MADM, such as the TOPSIS method [16] [17] [18], the maximizing deviation method [19] [20] [21], the gray relational analysis method [22], the VIKOR (VlseKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje) method [23] [24] [25], the PROMETHEE (Preference Ranking Organisation METHod…”
- On distance and correlation measures of hesitant fuzzy information (2011, background): “On the basis of the Hamming distance, Xu 12 defined the concepts of deviation degrees and similarity degrees between linguistic values, and between linguistic preference relations, respectively.”
- Intuitionistic preference relations and their application in group decision making (2007, background): “If sa 2 S, then sa is termed an original linguistic label, otherwise, sa is termed a virtual linguistic label [55].”
- A Fuzzy Linguistic Methodology to Deal With Unbalanced Linguistic Term Sets (2008, background): “The fuzzy linguistic approach [54]–[56] deals with qualitative aspects that are represented in qualitative terms by means of linguistic variables, providing an important tool for solving problems in different areas such as information retrieval [7], [8], [26]–[28], [35], [36], [57], services evaluat”
- Distance and similarity measures for hesitant fuzzy sets (2011, background): “For example, based on the Hamming distance, Xu [38] introduced the concepts of deviation degrees and similarity degrees between two linguistic values, and between two linguistic preference relations, respectively.”
- Consistency Measures for Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Preference Relations (2014, background): “Xu [24] defined the distance between two linguistic terms, sα and sβ , (sα , sβ ∈ S) as follows:”
- Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic VIKOR Method and Its Application in Qualitative Multiple Criteria Decision Making (2015, background): “To do so, Xu [46] proposed the subscript-symmetric additive linguistic term set, shown as { | , .”
- The consensus models with interval preference opinions and their economic interpretation (2015, background): “In many practical instances of decision making, linguistic information [33,34] or fuzzy information [35] are widely used to express DM's preference, which means the crisp value cannot fully denote the real viewpoint of a DM.”