Demand and Dematerialization Impacts of Second‐Hand Markets
By Valerie M. Thomas. 2003
140 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Marketing
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/04066e98498cb7649995b971c9a752559befb95d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
In Marketing
- Gal Raz
- Vered Blass
- Renaud Lunardo
- R. Startz
- F. Benoit-Moreau
- Trevor Zink
- Roland Geyer
- Anton Ovchinnikov
Citations in the corpus
- Circular Economy Rebound (2017, background): “There is some theoretical and anecdotal evidence that many recycling 596 Journal of Industrial Ecology and refurbishment activities are likely to increase total production and consumption, that is, Pr od > 0 (Thomas 2003; Zink et al. 2014, 2016).”
- Does the Circular Economy Grow the Pie? The Case of Rebound Effects From Smartphone Reuse (2018, background): “As a result, the production of new units is only partly displaced by CE products and thus the overall production increases (Thomas, 2003; Ghose et al., 2006; Geyer and Doctori Blass, 2010; Guide and Li, 2010).”
- Product/Service‐Systems for a Circular Economy: The Route to Decoupling Economic Growth from Resource Consumption? (2019, unknown): “However, as also discussed in relation to CE, second-hand products do not always replace new products (Thomas 2003), and when sold at lower prices the result is often an overall increase in consumption.”
- Sustainability of the sharing economy in question: When second-hand peer-to-peer platforms stimulate indulgent consumption (2017, background): “…unnecessary items because of their low price or the capacity to resell them easily (e.g., Robert et al., 2014) and rebound effects through purchasing other things with the savings from second-hand buying (Peugeot et al., 2015; Thomas, 2003, 2011).”
- A Market‐Based Framework for Quantifying Displaced Production from Recycling or Reuse (2016, methodology): “Because no method for estimating displacement rate exists, environmental assessments have typically rested on the “inaccurate assumption” (Ekvall, 2000) of one-to-one, or full displacement (Thomas, 2003).”
- Economic and Environmental Assessment of Remanufacturing Strategies for Product + Service Firms (2014, background): “Environmental assessment of remanufacturing is also addressed in the Industrial Ecology literature, for example, Thomas (2003, 2011) and Geyer (2004).”
- Common Misconceptions about Recycling (2016, background): “An alternative that is used to study displacement at the consumer level is utility theory (Ferrer 1996; Thomas 2003).”
- Slower Consumption Reflections on Product Life Spans and the “Throwaway Society” (2005, background): “” In recent years there have been policy reviews of durability as a waste reduction strategy (Cooper 1994) and “environmental product strategy” (Heiskanen 1996), a book on marketing longer-lasting products (Kostecki 1998), empirical and theoretical literature on second hand markets (Gregson and Crew”
- Understanding Collaborative Consumption: An Extension of the Theory of Planned Behavior with Value-Based Personal Norms (2017, unknown): “…of Hohenheim (570G), 70593 Stuttgart, Germany 1 However, researchers have also called out rebound effects and overconsumption as potential risks that might dilute or reverse collaborative consumption’s economic, environmental, and social advantages (Thomas 2003, 2011; Robert et al. 2014).”