CONTROLS ON ANNUAL NITROGEN CYCLING IN THE UNDERSTORY OF A SUBARCTIC BIRCH FOREST

By P. Grogan, S. Jonasson. 2003

118 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Atmospheric Science, Ecology, Soil Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/03eba08fb2e4f99b3e9ff4227fa0314154588973

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Atmospheric Science

1. F. Chapin
2. M. Bret-Harte
3. Vladimir E. Romanovsky
4. K. Klanderud

In Ecology

1. Haiyan Chu
2. F. Chapin
3. M. Bret-Harte
4. P. Grogan
5. J. Schimel
6. K. Klanderud
7. Noah Fierer

In Soil Science

1. P. Grogan
2. J. Schimel
3. Haiyan Chu
4. Joseph M. Craine
5. Noah Fierer

Citations in the corpus

• Soil nitrogen cycling rates in low arctic shrub tundra are enhanced by litter feedbacks (2010, background): “…to plants Plant growth in mesic tundra is generally N-limited (Shaver and Chapin 1980) and plants compete poorly for N with soil microbes, at least over an annual time scale (Buckeridge and Jefferies 2007; Grogan and Jonasson 2003; Marion et al. 1982; Schimel and Chapin 1996; Sorensen et al. 2008).”
• Freeze–thaw regime effects on carbon and nitrogen dynamics in sub-arctic heath tundra mesocosms (2004, unknown): “…a subject of major ecological interest, because it is often suggested that freeze–thaw events may be a major factor contributing to the microbial release of nutrients in plant available form (Dowding et al., 1981; Schimel et al., 1996; Weih, 1998; Lipson et al., 1999; Grogan and Jonasson, 2003).”
• Winter Biological Processes Could Help Convert Arctic Tundra to Shrubland (2005, background): “…(bacterial and fungal) respiration continues in arctic soils through the winter (Kelley et al. 1968, Zimov et al. 1993, Oechel et al. 1997, Fahnestock et al. 1999, Welker et al. 2000), along with nitrogen mineralization (Giblin et al. 1991, Grogan and Jonasson 2003, Weintraub and Schimel 2003).”
• Plant and soil responses to neighbour removal and fertilization in Alaskan tussock tundra (2004, methodology): “…methods very similar to ours did not change the dynamics of microbial C and N processing and retention in a subarctic birch forest, even though soil N availability increased (Grogan & Jonasson 2003), suggesting that this mechanism is relatively unimportant in vascular plant removal treatments.”