Automated binning of microsatellite alleles: problems and solutions
By W. Amos, J. Hoffman, A. Frodsham, Lyna Zhang, S. Best, A. Hill. 2006
463 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Molecular Biology, Plant Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/03e416deaee28facaa11ec2b43873911da4998f3
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Molecular Biology
- R. Petit
- G. Vendramin
- S. Wagner
- Olivier Lepais
- Thibaut Malausa
- Philippe Chaumeil
- E. Guichoux
- F. Salin
In Plant Science
- R. Petit
- G. Vendramin
- S. Wagner
- Olivier Lepais
- Thibaut Malausa
- Philippe Chaumeil
- E. Guichoux
- F. Salin
Citations in the corpus
- A consensus list of microsatellite markers for olive genotyping (2009, methodology): “Genotyping with di-nucleotide microsatellites is difficult because separation of neighbouring alleles requires very precise and reliable protocols for allele separation and identification to avoid allele misidentification ( Amos et al. 2007 ).”
- Current trends in microsatellite genotyping (2011, methodology): “In our laboratory, we developed an Excel macro, inspired from FlexiBin (Amos et al. 2007), Autobin (http:// www4.bordeaux-aquitaine.inra.fr/biogeco/Ressources/ Logiciels/Autobin), which automatically analyses raw data generated with commercial software (Appendix 1).”