Current trends in microsatellite genotyping

886 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Microsatellite markers: what they mean and why they are so useful (2016, background): “…of articles over the past two decades, some of which are highlighted here: Jarne and Lagoda (1996); Schlötterer (1998); Li et al. (2002); Buschiazzo and Gemmell (2006); Oliveira et al. (2006); Sun et al. (2009); Guichoux et al. (2011); Gemayel et al. (2012); Senan et al. (2014); Mason (2015).”
Inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR) markers: are we doing it right? (2015, background): “…still the marker of choice for many genetic variation studies that require markers with high resolution, hypervariability, and co-dominance (Guichoux et al. 2011; Kalia et al. 2011), ISSR with its ease of application makes preliminary studies on genetic variation more accessible to…”
Recent advances of genome mapping and marker‐assisted selection in aquaculture (2013, background): “There are a number of approaches for genotyping microsatellites (Guichoux et al. 2011).”
PopGenReport: simplifying basic population genetic analyses in R (2014, background): “Microsatellite markers are often used over other types of markers due to their high allelic diversity, which allows large amounts of population genetic information to be gained from a relatively small number of loci (Guichoux et al. 2011).”