Restoring natural capital : science, business, and practice

By J. Aronson, S. Milton, J. Blignaut. 2007

216 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

An operational model for mainstreaming ecosystem services for implementation (2008, background): “For example, this was done to mainstream restoration projects in South Africa that delivered on both ecosystem service and social equity goals (84, 85).”
Are Socioeconomic Benefits of Restoration Adequately Quantified? A Meta‐analysis of Recent Papers (2000–2008) in Restoration Ecology and 12 Other Scientific Journals (2010, background): “This historical disconnect could and should disappear as restoration can so clearly enhance the delivery of ecosystem services of all kinds (Aronson et al. 2007; European Communities 2008; Goldstein et al. 2008; Harris et al. 2006; Rey Benayas et al. 2008, 2009) and the maintenance of biodiversity…”
Using return‐on‐investment to guide restoration: a case study from Hawaii (2008, background): “Ecological restoration is playing an increasing role in conservation, following new understanding of the values of natural capital (Aronson et al. 2007; Millennium Ecosystem Assessment 2003) and, in extreme cases, the human and ecological disasters precipitated by its loss (Danielsen et al.”
Intervention Ecology: Applying Ecological Science in the Twenty-first Century (2011, background): “Restoration ecology is traditionally focused on the local system being restored, rather than on the broader socioeconomic and political settings, although there have been recent attempts to fuse the two (Aronson et al. 2007).”