Continuous flash suppression reduces negative afterimages

By Naotsugu Tsuchiya, Christof Koch. Nature Neuroscience, 2005

906 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Molecular Biology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0387a7c112581f055a46e24b179ee678680f384c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Jean-Pierre Changeux
2. Stanislas Dehaene
3. H. Berlin
4. Randolph Blake
5. Ming Meng
6. Frank Tong
7. Gary Lupyan
8. Leonardo G. Cohen

In Molecular Biology

1. H. Berlin
2. Frank Tong
3. Stanislas Dehaene
4. Gary Lupyan
5. Jean-Pierre Changeux

Citations in the corpus

• Report Olfaction Modulates Visual Perception in Binocular Rivalry (2010, neutral): “To test this, in experiment 3 we measured the time needed for the two images (rose versus marker) to break from interocular continuous flash suppression [8, 9] under the two olfactory conditions (PEA versus butanol, respectively), a technique that targets the information processing while the stimuli”
• Experimental and theoretical approaches to conscious processing. (2011, background): “However, a variant of binocular rivalry, the continuous flash suppression paradigm allows an image to be made permanently invisible by presenting continuously flashing shapes in the other eye (Tsuchiya and Koch, 2005).”
• Neural bases of binocular rivalry. (2006, background): “Rivalry suppression or prolonged dichoptic masking can also weaken the formation of visual afterimages [42, 43 ], providing further evidence that rivalry can attenuate low-level adaptation.”
• Cognitive Penetrability of Perception in the Age of Prediction: Predictive Systems are Penetrable Systems (2015, background): “CFS, a variant of binocular rivalry, is known to suppress visual representations at a low level, for instance substantially reducing negative afterimages (Tsuchiya and Koch 2005), and wiping out”
• The Neural Basis of the Dynamic Unconscious (2011, methodology): “Another form of “suppression” worth mentioning here is visual perceptual suppression (Blake & Logothetis, 2002; Kim & Blake, 2005; Tsuchiya & Koch, 2005), which occurs when an image—or part of one—is not accessible to conscious perception (i.e., not seen), even though the stimulus is present on the…”
• Temporal filling-in reduces attentional fluctuations in sustained visual attention (2026, unknown): “It is worth noting that the color alternation of target stimuli in the filling-in condition may appear more salient, which would predict increased rather than decreased visual SSEPs (Tsuchiya and Koch, 2005).”