The value of nest boxes in the research and management of Australian hollow-using arboreal marsupials

By G. Beyer, Ross Goldingay. 2006

115 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Use of artificial tree hollows by Australian birds and bats (2009, methodology): “Nest boxes have been used as a survey tool to determine the distribution and abundance of cryptic arboreal mammal species (Beyer and Goldingay 2006).”
How to make a common species rare: A case against conservation complacency (2011, background): “The Greater Glider is not known to use artificial nest sites such as nest boxes (Beyer and Goldingay, 2006; Lindenmayer et al., 2009b).”
Specific nest box designs can improve habitat restoration for cavity‐dependent arboreal mammals (2015, background): “This should make little difference because nest box entrance size is the key factor that determines the use by species rather than small differences in box dimensions (Beyer & Goldingay 2006; Goldingay et al. 2007; Goldingay & Stevens 2009).”
Characteristics of tree hollows used by Australian birds and bats (2009, background): “This places more reliance on using artificial hollows to supplement the needs of hollow-dependent species (Beyer and Goldingay 2006; Harley 2006; Goldingay and Stevens 2009).”
Use of nest-boxes by the Zebra Finch (Taeniopygia guttata): implications for reproductive success and research (2008, background): “Despite the long history of studies using nest-box in the northern hemisphere, there has been comparatively little use, to date, of nest-boxes inAustralasia (and then largely restricted to arboreal marsupials; Beyer and Goldingay 2006).”