Use of artificial tree hollows by Australian birds and bats
By Ross Goldingay, J. Stevens. 2009
101 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Developmental Biology, Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e3ae4301cf5815564c3ffd7cb5d5bf5dddf1f423
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Developmental Biology
In Ecology
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Citations in the corpus
- Specific nest box designs can improve habitat restoration for cavity‐dependent arboreal mammals (2015, background): “This should make little difference because nest box entrance size is the key factor that determines the use by species rather than small differences in box dimensions (Beyer & Goldingay 2006; Goldingay et al. 2007; Goldingay & Stevens 2009).”
- Microclimate in tree cavities and nest-boxes: implications for hole-nesting birds (2017, background): “providing nest-boxes has facilitated the population recovery or increase of several bird 49 species (reviewed in Newton, 1998; Goldingay and Stevens, 2009; and Lindenmayer et al., 50 2009), there is uncertainty as to whether nest-boxes can be considered an adequate 51 functional substitute for tree ”