Informal transport: A global perspective

485 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A survey of Demand Responsive Transport in Great Britain (2012, background): “…options typically serve busy urban corridors, thus attracting sufficient numbers of passengers to create a profitable service by being more attractive to users than public transport options by virtue of their being quicker and more comfortable (Adeniji, 1987; Vuchic, 2005, Cervero and Golub, 2007).”
The political economy of car dependence: A systems of provision approach (2020, background): “consideration for broader network context” ([232]:224) and high levels of ‘informal’ provision [261].”
The equity impacts of bus rapid transit: A review of the evidence and implications for sustainable transport (2018, background): “Paratransit services often deliver large benefits to poor populations, by providing service coverage in areas lacking formal transit, jobs for unskilled workers, and a high degree of customer responsiveness (Cervero & Golub, 2007).”
A Systems Dynamics Approach to Explore Traffic Congestion and Air Pollution Link in the City of Accra, Ghana (2010, background): “The dire traffic congestion situation is even worse in megacities such as Bangkok, Manila, Sao Paulo, Shanghai and Mexico City [18,19].”