A dynamic interaction between aggression and grooming reciprocity among female chacma baboons

By L. Barrett, D. Gaynor, S. P. Henzi. 2002

136 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental Biology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/02fba66401638a3679e26a630a268512ccc59a28

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental Biology

1. Joan B. Silk
2. G. Schino
3. S. Henzi
4. C. Schaik
5. Jennifer E. Smith
6. L. Barrett
7. S. Dawes
8. R. A. Hill

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. G. Schino
2. M. Gumert
3. Joan B. Silk
4. Jennifer E. Smith
5. S. Henzi
6. L. Barrett
7. Kay E. Holekamp
8. R. A. Hill

In Social Psychology

1. Jennifer E. Smith
2. G. Schino
3. Joan B. Silk
4. M. Gumert
5. C. Schaik
6. L. Barrett
7. S. Henzi
8. Kay E. Holekamp

Citations in the corpus

• Day length, latitude and behavioural (in)flexibility in baboons (Papio cynocephalus ursinus) (2003, background): “…changes in the nature of the grooming relationships before and after the disease epidemic and home range shift at De Hoop have been reported (Barrett et al. 2002), and different ecological relationships were reported before and after a home range shift at Amboseli (Bronikowski and Altmann…”
• Payment for sex in a macaque mating market (2007, background): “Dominance steepness can influence groomingetolerance interchange by decreasing grooming reciprocity when the dominance gradient between two partners is steep and tolerance is needed more by the subordinate partner (Barrett et al. 2002; Stevens et al. 2005).”
• Cooperation experiments: coordination through communication versus acting apart together (2006, background): “This does not apply for ‘tolerance’ used in a different sense: instances in which members of normally rather ‘intolerant’ species (sensu Thierry 2000), such as baboons, temporarily accept that subordinate group members share a food source with them (Barrett & Henzi 2001; Barrett et al. 2002).”
• Grooming and agonistic support: a meta-analysis of primate reciprocal altruism (2007, background): “In particular, it remains to be fully understood why agonistic alliances are common in some species and rare in others and how the services primates exchange vary according to differences in ecological conditions (Barrett et al. 2002; Pazol and Cords 2005).”
• Time-matched grooming in female primates?: New analyses from two species (2004, background): “Thus, Barrett et al. (2002) showed that the magnitude of grooming disparities within bouts decreased in one baboon group as the intensity of within-group resource competition was relaxed.”
• Greetings promote cooperation and reinforce social bonds among spotted hyaenas (2011, background): “…maintenance is well documented among primates living in cohesive groups (e.g. Matheson & Bernstein 2000; Lazaro-Perea et al. 2004; Silk et al. 2006; Gomes et al. 2009), especially when the value of social partners changes dynamically with time and circumstances (e.g. Barrett et al. 2002, 2003).”
• Cyclicity in the structure of female baboon social networks (2009, background): “The troops occupy South African habitats that differ in both the local dispersion of resources and the season during which food was most abundant (Barrett et al. 2002; Henzi et al. 1992; Hill 1999).”