Defining ‘success’ for software projects: An exploratory revelation
By Nitin Agarwal, Urvashi Rathod. 2006
394 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Information Systems, Management Information Systems, Management Science and Operations Research
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/02bf0351b0dd9eb0d169fe7e961cf207de803eaa
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Information Systems
In Management Information Systems
In Management Science and Operations Research
Citations in the corpus
- Does risk management contribute to IT project success? A meta-analysis of empirical evidence (2010, methodology): “An adjusted definition of project success, based on the work of e.g. Shenhar et al. (2001), which considers project success in general, and e.g. Agarwal and Rathod (2006) and Procaccino and Verner (2006), which focuses on IT project success in particular is suggested here.”
- The positive effect of expressing negative emotions on knowledge creation capability and performance of project teams (2016, background): “Project performance can be assessed in terms of product delivery within the targeted time, cost, and quality (Agarwal and Rathod, 2006).”
- Linking trust and collaboration in project teams to project management success (2018, background): “Literature review Practitioners and researchers place a great deal of emphasis on achieving the objectives of the “iron triangle” of PM success (Agarwal and Rathod, 2006; Fortune and White, 2006; Turner and Cochrane, 1993) and focus less on the human-related aspect of projects which are woven into t”