Beyond technology-push and demand-pull: Lessons from California's solar policy

By Margaret R. Taylor. 2008

223 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Environmental Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/02bd24ea1b46cec3ac3d507fb2651a60ac97d826

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Environmental Engineering

Citations in the corpus

Taking risks in the face of uncertainty: An exploratory analysis of green innovation (2016, background): “Studies of a range of environmental technologies, for example, have emphasised the role of the contemporaneous development of supply-side capability and market demand, often supported by public policy (Dijk and Yarime, 2010; Norberg-Bohm, 2000; Taylor, 2008).”
The role of patent protection in (clean/green) technology transfer (2010, background): “be policy interventions in place in developed countries dedicated to market creation (Taylor, 2008) such as subsidies, to promote demand for green technologies produced in developing countries.”
Do policy mix characteristics matter for low-carbon innovation? A survey-based exploration of renewable power generation technologies in Germany (2018, background): “, 2012) as well as systemic instruments (Cantner et al., 2016; Smits and Kuhlmann, 2004; Taylor, 2008; Wieczorek and Hekkert, 2012).”
Peer Effects in the Diffusion of Solar Photovoltaic Panels (2012, background): “This could be indicative of either peer effects or spatially correlated 6For an overview of the history of solar PV policy in California, see Taylor (2008). 10”
Energy technology patents–CO2 emissions nexus: An empirical analysis from China (2012, background): “The government could ensure quality installers through decentralized policies like training and certification programs, and ensure quality installations through decentralized policies like inspection programs and warranty requirements (Taylor, 2008).”
China’s new energy vehicle policies: Evolution, comparison and recommendation (2018, unknown): “…(Wachtmeister, 2013); regulatory and economic (Bergek et al., 2014); upstream investment, market creation, and interface improvement (Taylor, 2008); supply-side, environmental-side, and demand-side (Rothwell and Zegveld, 1981; Steinmueller et al., 2010); government-selection versus…”
Consumer attitude and purchase intention toward rooftop photovoltaic installation: The roles of personal trait, psychological benefit, and government incentives (2020, background): “In other words, rooftop PV installation should be supported with a “push” from an incentive program.(45) Most studies discuss government incentives for rooftop PV from the viewpoint of energy policy.”
A Review of Solar Photovoltaic Levelized Cost of Electricity (2011, unknown): “In addition, it should be mentioned that cost effectiveness (or in this case obtaining grid parity) is not necessarily a sufficient driver for people to invest in any new technology including residential PV systems [15, 108-114].”
Diffusion of environmentally-friendly energy technologies: buy versus lease differences in residential PV markets (2013, unknown): “…tried to design programs and incentives to spread the adoption of more efficient and environmentally-friendly consumption and generation devices (Taylor 2008), the nature of the individual’s decision-making process has come to sharper focus (Allcott and Mullainathan 2010, Dietz 2010, Drury et…”