CAR USE: LUST AND MUST
By L. Steg. 2001
324 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/02bccd7e596190714b898987f1ff237f0882fa01
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- L. Steg
- P. Singleton
- E. van der Werff
- G. Perlaviciute
- Birgitta Gatersleben
- J. Kent
- C. J. Bergstad
- Anja Peters
Citations in the corpus
- Response to Travel Information: A Behavioural Review (2015, background): “Cars are often perceived as symbols of status and freedom (Steg, 2005).”
- Affective Appraisals of the Daily Commute (2007, background): “Steg (2004) examined the affective experience of using the car for commuting journeys.”
- Discussing the “positive utilities” of autonomous vehicles: will travellers really use their time productively? (2019, background): “Aspects related to SWB—including intrinsic motives for travelling (Mokhtarian et al., 2015) and non-instrumental affective and symbolic factors (Steg, 2005)—have been found to influence travel behaviours (De Vos & Witlox, 2016).”
- Affective-Symbolic and Instrumental-Independence Psychological Motives Mediating Effects of Socio-Demographic Variables on Daily Car Use (2011, methodology): “…of (1) answers to 32 statements related to the, affectivesymbolic, instrumental, and independence psychological motives for car use (adapted from Steg, 2005, see Table 2) obtained on seven-point rating scales ranging from “totally disagree” (0) to “agree completely” (6), (2) questions about the…”
- Autonomous Driving: Technical, Legal and Social Aspects (2016, background): “Therefore, to treat individuals differently on the basis of their age, when age is not a relevant factor, seems to be exactly the kind of discrimination the IEEE prohibits [18, 33].”
- Psychological determinants of fuel consumption of purchased new cars (2011, methodology): “The items were based on Ajzen’s 11 (2007) general recommendations and on previous studies of environmental behavior 12 (e.g., Hunecke, Blöbaum, Matthies, & Höger, 2001; Steg, 2005; Scholl & Sydow, 13 2002); in a few cases the exact wording was adopted while most of the items were 14 modified to diff”