Russian Privatization and Corporate Governance: What Went Wrong?

By Bernard S. Black, Reinier H. Kraakman, Anna S. Tarassova. 2000

618 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/02b35154304ca5039a10955e8ce474eeb503248c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Political Science and International Relations

1. Stephan Haggard
2. Shahzad Uddin
3. Trevor Hopper
4. Clay Shirky
5. Wolfgang Drechsler
6. Andrew MacIntyre
7. L. Tiede

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Stephan Haggard
2. Giancarlo Spagnolo
3. Mark J. Roe
4. Trevor Hopper
5. Clay Shirky
6. Wolfgang Drechsler
7. Andrew MacIntyre
8. L. Tiede

Citations in the corpus

• The Rise and Demise of the New Public Management (2005, background): “Even more remarkable is that after much bitter experience with corporate governance in Russia, Black and Kraakman reversed themselves [Black et al. 2000] and argued for a more pragmatic "staged" approach to legal and institutional development.”
• Management accounting in less developed countries: what is known and needs knowing (2009, background): “This may bring informal and arbitrary management controls, information restricted to family confines, and rules and regulations superseded by family or friendship connections (Black et al., 2000).”