Energy efficiency fallacies revisited

By L. Brookes. 2000

255 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Environmental Engineering, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/02921bb1a0b605c3e2b4bb5007c8f397055b2be9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Environmental Engineering

In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

Citations in the corpus

Heterogeneity in the rebound effect: Further evidence for Germany (2012, unknown): “Though the basic mechanism underlying the rebound effect is widely accepted, its magnitude remains a contentious question (e. g. BROOKES 2000, BINSWANGER 2001, GREENING, GREENE, and DIFIGLIO, 2000, SORRELL and DIMITROUPOULOS, 2008).”
Estimating direct and indirect rebound effects for U.S. households with input–output analysis Part 1: Theoretical framework (2013, background): “…as the energy consumption induced by a lower market price for energy, changes in economic structure, economic-competiveness (Allan et al., 2007; Brookes, 1990, 2000; Howarth, 1997; Saunders, 1992, 2000, 2008, 2010; Wei, 2010), investment and disinvestment, and labor market changes resulting…”
Jevons’ Paradox revisited: The evidence for backfire from improved energy efficiency (2009, background): “Would this increase (and the associated increase in energy consumption) have occurred if conversion efficiencies had stayed at the abysmally low levels prevailing in the early years of the nineteenth century?’’ (Brookes, 2000) To capture this interdependence, the relationship could be better express”
Energy Conservation More Effective With Rebound Policy (2011, background): “…papers on the topic have mainly appeared in energy journals, mostly in Energy Policy and The Energy Journal Khazzoom 1980, 1987, 1989; Lovins 1988; Brookes 1990, 2000; Saunders 1992, 2000; Herring 1999, 2006; Berkhout et al. 2000; Birol and Keppler 2000; Jaccard and Bataille 2000; Sanne 2000;…”
Household carbon emission research: An analytical review of measurement, influencing factors and mitigation prospects (2015, unknown): “These effects may lead to increased overall energy consumption in the long term - a phenomenon known as “backfire” (Brookes, 2000; Saunders, 1992).”
Consumption and the Rebound Effect: An Industrial Ecology Perspective (2005, background): “ Brookes (2000) argues that energy productivity will always tend to be pursued and employed in ways that lead to raising multifactor productivity growth more rapidly than energy productivity growth.”
The rebound effect: an assessment of the evidence for economy-wide energy savings from improved energy efficiency (2007, background): “6 Others argue that they are sufficiently important to completely offset the energy savings from improved energy efficiency (Brookes, 2000; Herring, 2006).”
“Rebound” Effects from Increased Energy Efficiency: A Time to Pause and Reflect (2013, background): “%) argument that is developed by Brookes (1990, 2000), Saunders (1990, 2000) and others, with more recent survey contributions focus-sing on this particular issue by Alcott (2005), Dimitropoulos (2007), Sorrell 3.”
Consumer End-Use Energy Efficiency and Rebound Effects (2014, background): “The Khazzoom-Brookes postulate and neoclassical growth.”
Missing carbon reductions? Exploring rebound and backfire effects in UK households (2010, background): “In some cases it is even argued that these effects lead to increased energy demand over the long term – an outcome that has been termed ‘backfire’ (Saunders 1992; Brookes 2000).”
Dilemma between economic development and energy conservation: Energy rebound effect in China☆ (2012, background): “This is the famous KhazzoomeBrookes hypothesis.”
Energy, Economic Growth and Environmental Sustainability: Five Propositions (2010, background): “Various historical examples can be cited in support of this [1,2,20], including the experience with steam turbines during the Industrial Revolution (Figure 1).”