Robust causal inference using directed acyclic graphs: the R package 'dagitty'.
By Johannes Textor, Benito van der Zander, Mark S. Gilthorpe, M. Liskiewicz, G. Ellison. International Journal of Epidemiology, 2017
2,294 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, History and Philosophy of Science, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/021a5279928211120bbcda8a8d2d2304b26575ae
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Eran Segal
- Dan Knights
- Russell D. Wolfinger
- Levi Waldron
- Jeroen Raes
- Richard Bowden
- P. Tennant
- Cesare Furlanello
In History and Philosophy of Science
In Statistics and Probability
- Mark S. Gilthorpe
- G. Ellison
- Dan Knights
- M. Fox
- Russell D. Wolfinger
- Levi Waldron
- Richard Bowden
- Joaquín Dopazo
Citations in the corpus
- D’ya Like DAGs? A Survey on Structure Learning and Causal Discovery (2021, background): “causaleffect [240] general causality, R daggity [237] general causality, R dosearch [239] causal effect identification, R Causal Discovery Toolbox [120] causal discovery, Python pcalg [122] causal discovery, R bnlearn [215] causal discovery, R rEDM [181] dynamic modeling and convergent cross mapping”
- Reporting guidelines for Human Microbiome Research: the STORMS checklist (2021, background): “As part of this theoretical justification, authors should consider including a directed acyclic graph showing the hypothesized causal relationships of interest 35,36 .”
- Use of directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) to identify confounders in applied health research: review and recommendations (2020, methodology): “Data were extracted on the reporting of: estimands, DAGs and adjustment sets, alongside the characteristics of each article’s largest DAG.”