Presumed domestication? Evidence for wild rice cultivation and domestication in the fifth millennium BC of the Lower Yangtze region
By D. Fuller, Emma Harvey, Ling Qin. Antiquity, 2007
271 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Geography, Planning and Development, Paleontology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/020ef096b932c1f0a7f73b4265cb715d7f8a5092
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Geography, Planning and Development
- D. Fuller
- Ling Qin
- Cristina Castillo
- Yo-ichiro Sato
- C. Higham
- R. Ishikawa
- M. Kajale
- Katsunori Tanaka
In Paleontology
In Sociology and Political Science
Citations in the corpus
- The emergence of agriculture in southern China (2010, background): “In the early stages of agriculture in the Middle–Lower Yangtze, rice did not account for a high proportion of production, and full morphological domestication did not occur until after 5000 BC (Fuller et al. 2007).”
- Declining oaks, increasing artistry, and cultivating rice: the environmental and social context of the emergence of farming in the Lower Yangtze Region (2010, background): “Previously, based on a marked decline in oak pollen before 5000 BC reported by Tao et al. (2006), it was suggested that the shift towards rice agriculture might have been driven by a response to declining availability of wild nut resources (Fuller et al. 2007; 2008).”
- Finding Plant Domestication in the Indian Subcontinent (2011, background): “…evidence for early contacts between northwestern South Asia (not the northeast) and China, and the archaeobotanical evidence in China that increasingly suggests a slow and late domestication process for rice (Fuller, Harvey, and Qin 2007; Fuller, Qin, and Harvey 2008; Fuller et al. 2009, 2010).”
- The evolving story of rice evolution (2008, background): “An eco-genetic hypothesis for the domestication of Asian rice There is sufficient archaeobotanical evidence to state that rice was domesticated in the region of the Yangtze River valley of China [85,86].”
- Archaeogenetic study of prehistoric rice remains from Thailand and India: evidence of early japonica in South and Southeast Asia (2016, methodology): “In past studies, it has been shown that indica rice normally has a L/W ratio of >2.5, whereas japonica rice is <2.3 (Fuller et al. 2007).”
- Early Neolithic pig domestication at Jiahu, Henan Province, China: clues from molar shape analyses using geometric morphometric approaches (2011, unknown): “, 1999, 2004) and, where purported, evidence of the earliest rice domestication in Northern China though this claim remains controversial (Chen and Jiang, 1997; Chen et al., 1995; Fuller et al., 2007; Liu et al., 2007, 2006; Zhang and Wang, 1998).”
- Pathways to Asian Civilizations: Tracing the Origins and Spread of Rice and Rice Cultures (2011, background): “I do not here want to repeat critiques of a few years ago (Fuller et al. 2007, 2008), which in the context of Hemudu culture have been vindicated by extensive systematic sampling at Tianluoshan (Fuller et al. 2009, 2011a), but will summarize the current state of the evidence.”
- Water management and labour in the origins and dispersal of Asian rice (2009, background): “…archaeobotanical data are far more limited, grain metrics from Bashidang (7000–6000 BC) show a similar average and range as those from Kuahuqiao (Fuller et al. 2007, 2008), whereas later grains from 4300–3500 show significant proportions of wider and longer grains, including some types at…”