Emerging paradigms of cognition in medical decision-making

By Vimla L. Patel, D. Kaufman, J. Arocha. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 2002

355 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Naturalistic Decision Making and Organizations: Reviewing Pragmatic Science (2006, background): “Indeed, the imperative to make accurate decisions is a very real one given growing research highlighting that ‘physicians’ decisions too often … lead to adverse consequences for a patient’ (Patel et al. 2002: 52).”
A unified foundation for business analytics (2014, background): “While decision making is certainly a key facet of business, a manager is also concerned with solvingmore than decision problems.”
Cognitive Biases and Heuristics in Medical Decision Making (2015, background): “’’ Real-world clinical decision making is also mediated by technology and teamwork.(7) Thus, ‘‘one can argue that traditional and naturalistic decision making researchers are in fact studying markedly different phenomena.”
MAHI: investigation of social scaffolding for reflective thinking in diabetes management (2008, background): “Much of the work in supporting decision-making for analysts tends to be informed by research in decisionmaking [22] that has a clearly defined normative character and presupposes an existence of an “optimal” decision in majority of situations.”
Artificial Intelligence and the Implementation Challenge (2019, background): “Clinical decision making is a complex process involving the integration of a variety of data sources, incorporating both tacit and explicit modes of intelligence [34-36].”