Climate models and their evaluation

1,868 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The ‘too few, too bright’ tropical low‐cloud problem in CMIP5 models (2012, unknown): “[ 2 ] Climate models exhibit a large range of climate sensitivity estimates, which primarily arises from differing cloud radiative feedbacks amongst models [ Randall et al. , 2007; Bony et al. , 2006; Andrews et al. , 2012].”
The Marginal Damage Costs of Different Greenhouse Gases: An Application of FUND (2014, unknown): “13 This is the modal estimate of climate sensitivity (Randall et al. 2007).”
Paleoclimate Implications for Human-Made Climate Change (2011, methodology): “report (Randall and Wood 2007).”
Earth's energy imbalance and implications (2011, background): “The range of model results in the IPCC (Randall et al., 2007) report was 2.1–4.4 C for doubled CO 2 .”
Potential applications of subseasonal‐to‐seasonal (S2S) predictions (2017, background): “A number of persistent biases and errors, however, still exist in most climate simulations, such as tropical precipitation and low cloud cover (e.g. Randall et al., 2007).”