Biocomplexity and fisheries sustainability
By Ray Hilborn, Thomas R. Quinn, D. Schindler, D. Rogers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2003
987 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/01d1ccfc9b547a4de6f4b3b3ff77a8efda6d2c9d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
- S. Cooke
- J. Emmett Duffy
- S. Hinch
- Robert Arlinghaus
- Thorsten B. H. Reusch
- M. Zimmerman
- D. Schindler
- J. Moore
In Global and Planetary Change
- S. Cooke
- Robert Arlinghaus
- S. Hinch
- D. Schindler
- Nils Chr. Stenseth
- J. Moore
- Jessica A. Miller
- D. Hjermann
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
Citations in the corpus
- Shifting dynamic forces in fish stock fluctuations triggered by age truncation? (2011, background): “The depletion of local populations may also have this effect (Hilborn et al., 2003).”
- Principles for linking fish habitat to fisheries management and conservation (2005, background): “The sockeye salmon Oncorhynchus nerka (Walbaum) fishery in Bristol Bay, Alaska, provides a good example of this principle (Hilborn et al., 2003).”
- Predicting differential effects of climate change at the population level with life‐cycle models of spring Chinook salmon (2007, background): “Nonetheless, more generally, variability in among-population response to climate can potentially serve as a buffer for the entire species (c.f. Hilborn et al., 2003), and may be important for metapopulation dynamics.”
- Quantifying the contribution of juvenile migratory phenotypes in a population of Chinook salmon Oncorhynchus tshawytscha (2010, background): “…distinct migratory phenotypes may experience differential survival and thus contribute to a population’s resiliency, defined as its ability to persist following disturbances across variable environmental conditions (Holling 1973, Stearns 1992, Hilborn et al. 2003, Secor 2007, Bottom et al. 2009).”
- Why biodiversity is important to the functioning of real‐world ecosystems (2009, background): “(b) Harvest of salmon in Alaska has been relatively stable over recent decades, despite strong fluctuations in individual stocks, because ecologically differentiated stocks respond differently to climate change and other environmental variation (Hilborn et al. 2003).”
- Global climate change and potential effects on Pacific salmonids in freshwater ecosystems of southeast Alaska (2009, background): “This biocomplexity is an important factor in the resilience of salmon stocks to a range of natural and anthropogenic disturbances (Hilborn et al. 2003).”
- Network-scale spatial and temporal variation in Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) redd distributions: patterns inferred from spatially continuous replicate surveys (2006, background): “A strategy focused on protection of core populations may be useful in the short term, but longer perspectives will also be needed to accommodate the dynamics of natural systems (Hilborn et al. 2003).”
- Centuries of Anadromous Forage Fish Loss: Consequences for Ecosystem Connectivity and Productivity (2012, background): “Restoring access to geographically diverse historical spawning sites would result in increased population biocomplexity and improved species resilience in the face of environmental changes (Hilborn et al. 2003).”
- Trophic ecology of Pacific salmon (Oncorhynchus spp.) in the ocean: a synthesis of stable isotope research (2009, background): “…understanding the responses of Pacific salmon to marine climate variation (e.g., Pearcy 1992; Hare and Francis 1995; Mantua et al. 1997; Peterman et al. 1998; Hilborn et al. 2003) and to escalating hatchery stocking rates (e.g., Beamish et al. 1997; Cooney and Brodeur 1998; Ruggerone et al. 2003).”
- Synchronization and portfolio performance of threatened salmon (2010, background): “In contrast, population asynchrony can be maintained by a diversity of phenotypes and variation among local environmental conditions (e.g., Hilborn et al. 2003, Crozier & Zabel 2006, Ruzzante et al. 2006).”
- Varying effects of anadromous sockeye salmon on the trophic ecology of two species of resident salmonids in southwest Alaska (2007, background): “million adult sockeye salmon ‘escape’ the Bristol Bay fishery each year and spawn in the Wood River system (Hilborn et al., 2003).”
- Regime Shifts, Resilience, and Biodiversity in Ecosystem Management (2004, neutral): “Such management is in stark contrast to the common focus on only the most productive runs at a certain moment in time (Hilborn et al. 2003).”
- Estimation of Stock Composition and Individual Identification of Sockeye Salmon on a Pacific Rim Basis Using Microsatellite and Major Histocompatibility Complex Variation (2005, background): “For this species, the dramatic increases produced by climate change in some populations have been offset by severe declines in others (Hilborn et al. 2003).”
- Documented and Potential Biological Impacts of Recreational Fishing: Insights for Management and Conservation (2006, background): “…ensures their adaptive potential and the resilience against environmental changes of a species and plays a critical role in holding fisheries sustainable (e.g., Hilborn et al., 2003), particularly in fish species characterized by a metapopulation structure (Policansky and Magnuson, 1998).”
- An Ecosystem Perspective on Re-establishing Native Deepwater Fishes in the Laurentian Great Lakes (2009, background): “…(2) reviewing current research on lake trout, pelagic ciscoes, and sculpins in relation to the conceptual model and identifying important research questions for each taxon; (3) posing questions emergent at community and ecosystem levels; and (4) identifying high-priority research topics.”