Common vs. Rare Allele Hypotheses for Complex Diseases

By Nicholas J. Schork, Sarah S. Murray, Kelly A. Frazer, Eric J. Topol. Current Opinion in Genetics and Development, 2009

694 citations recorded by the source corpus.

There has been growing debate over the nature of the genetic contribution to individual susceptibility to common complex diseases such as diabetes, osteoporosis, and cancer. The ‘Common Disease, Common Variant (CDCV)’ hypothesis argues that genetic variations with appreciable frequency in the population at large, but relatively low ‘penetrance’ (or the probability that a carrier of the relevant variants will express the disease), are the major contributors to genetic susceptibility to common diseases. The ‘Common Disease, Rare Variant (CDRV)’ hypothesis, on the other hand, argues that multiple rare DNA sequence variations, each with relatively high penetrance, are the major contributors to genetic susceptibility to common diseases. Both hypotheses have their place in current research efforts.

Subfields: Genetics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/01cc1309344e1a4796344bc4cde30dc21c4a73ef

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Genetics

  1. Edward S. Buckler
  2. P. Brown
  3. Eric Boerwinkle
  4. T. Rocheford
  5. Jim Holland
  6. Seunggeun Lee
  7. Elizabeth T. Cirulli
  8. Michael C. Wu

Citations in the corpus