The impact of government incentives for hybrid-electric vehicles: Evidence from US states
By D. Diamond. 2009
539 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Management Science and Operations Research, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/01c05188edab9a5d3ddf2af1dc35c44b42826c3a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Electrical and Electronic Engineering
In Management Science and Operations Research
In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
Citations in the corpus
- The impact of government policy on preference for NEVs: The evidence from China (2013, background): “…studies on purchase motives focus on Western countries, such as the UK, US and Switzerland (Lane and Potter, 2007; Ozaki and Sevastyanova, 2011; Diamond, 2009; Gallagher and Muehlegger, 2011), there are some empirical researches on ‘potential’ demand for NEVs in Japan (Kishi and Satoh, 2005),…”
- Policy Incentives for the Adoption of Electric Vehicles across Countries (2014, background): “Diamond [20] tested the relationship between HEV adoption and a variety of variables based on the hybrid registration data from different states, which suggested that gasoline prices, not incentive policies, were more closely related to EV adoption.”
- Prospect theory and energy efficiency (2019, background): “30 For example, see O'Donoghue and Rabin (2006), Duflo et al. (2011), Heutel (2015), or Farhi and Gabaix (2015). Thaler (2016, p. 1591) summarizes: "Expected utility theory remains the gold standard for how decisions should be made in the face of risk. Prospect theory is meant to be a complement to ”
- What does an electric vehicle replace? (2019, unknown): “Several recent studies have examined the impacts of government programs at both the federal and state levels in promoting the adoption of hybrid vehicles, including Diamond (2009), Beresteanu and Li (2011), Gallagher and Muehlegger (2007), and Sallee (2011).”
- Total cost of ownership and market share for hybrid and electric vehicles in the UK, US and Japan (2018, methodology): “Studies such as Diamond [26] use panel regression, examining both fixed and random effects, to assess the impact of incentives on vehicle adoption across different American states concluding that fuel price affects vehicle adoption more than incentives.”
- Providing the Spark: Impact of financial incentives on battery electric vehicle adoption (2019, result): “Diamond (2009) finds that the increase in market share of hybrids in the United States between 2001 and 2009 was likely influenced by gasoline price increases during this period rather than by vehicle incentives.4 In contrast, analysis by Gallagher and Muehlegger (2011) yields significant, positive…”