From commodity fetishism to commodity narcissism
By Robert Cluley, Stephen Dunne. 2012
93 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Marketing and consumer researchers have taken an increasing interest in the prevalence of and possibilities for enlightened consumerism. Contemporary studies show us, though, that ethically concerned consumers rarely act on their concerns – instead they act as if they were unenlightened about the negative effects of their consumption. The paper advances a theory for this contradiction that draws on Marx’s work on commodity fetishism and Freud’s analysis of sexual fetishism. In an attempt to reconcile the structural contexts of contemporary consumption with the psychic structures of the consuming subject proposed by each theorist, the paper concludes that narcissism, rather than fetishism, offers an explanation of this as if moment of contemporary consumption.
Subfields: Gender Studies, Marketing, Museology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/01baa05be1205c7780f9fc4f7337881fb034b279
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Marketing
Citations in the corpus
- The ideology of the ethical consumption gap (2016, background): “…did in fact decide to consume ethically).5 So why do we continue to act as if this gap holds the key to changing capitalism into a distribution system of global economic and social justice, a machine against global warming, and the great defender of human rights (cf. Cluley and Dunne, 2012)?”