Theory of current-driven domain wall motion: spin transfer versus momentum transfer.

By G. Tatara, H. Kohno. Physical Review Letters, 2004

728 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Materials Chemistry

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/01b42649e03b9fd60bf9bdbedec4d6e484cf4662

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

1. T. Dietl
2. Hideo Ohno
3. Axel Hoffmann
4. Y. Tserkovnyak
5. A. Brataas
6. C. Marrows
7. G. Bauer
8. B. Halperin

In Materials Chemistry

1. T. Dietl
2. Hideo Ohno
3. C. Marrows
4. Mathias Kläui
5. Daichi Chiba
6. Fumihiro Matsukura
7. J. Shibata
8. Michihiko Yamanouchi

Citations in the corpus

• Current-induced domain wall motion in nanoscale ferromagnetic elements (2011, background): “This actually corresponds to the high pinning case of Tatara et al [14], with a pinning field Hp larger than Hk/α, with Hk = 2Kd/(μ0Ms), the DW demagnetizing field.”
• Nonlocal magnetization dynamics in ferromagnetic heterostructures (2004, background): “The current-induced dynamics of domain walls (Barnes and Maekawa, 2005; Li and Zhang, 2004a; Tatara and Kohno, 2004 and references therein) are also beyond the macrospin considerations central to this review.”
• Dilute ferromagnetic semiconductors: Physics and spintronic structures (2013, background): “In particular, Wang et al., 2010a; Yamanouchi et al., 2006 presumed the dominance of the adiabatic spin torque, i. e., βw/αG 1, the assumption leading to (Tatara and Kohno, 2004) v = A(j2−j2c )1/2 for j > jc.”