Justice and cost effectiveness of consumption-based versus production-based approaches in the case of unilateral climate policies
By K. Steininger, Christian Lininger, Susanne Droege, D. Roser, Luke Tomlinson, Lukas H. Meyer. 2014
218 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Environmental Engineering, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/017b9ee516c24563dc58932b6f46c000928ecb7e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
In Environmental Engineering
In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
Citations in the corpus
- Consumption‐based carbon accounting: does it have a future? (2017, background): “The main difference, therefore, between the PB and CB accounting approaches is that application of the latter would entail a state with an abatement policy to cede responsibility for emissions associated with its export production and accept responsibility for the ‘embodied’ or ‘virtual’ emissions o”
- Carbon emissions of cities from a consumption-based perspective (2019, background): “However, despite its obvious advantages, PBA does not consider the ultimate destinations and final consumers for goods and services [8].”
- Behavioral change for the circular economy: A review with focus on electronic waste management in the EU (2020, background): “The latter approach assigns emissions to the consumption point of goods and services, which may provide a better guide for climate policies (Steininger et al., 2014).”
- Multiple carbon accounting to support just and effective climate policies (2016, background): “However, as burdens are passed on to others, the specific shares used in combining accounting indicators are unlikely to directly inform us about how burdensharing is really affected.(47) As the distribution of burdens depends on demand and supply elasticities, only a model-based analysis of the pro”
- Consumption-based emission accounting for Chinese cities (2016, background): “Consumption-based accounting’s advantages have been shown in many studies; this approach elucidates the drivers of emissions growth, improves cost-effectiveness and justice, addresses carbon leakage, promotes environmental comparative advantages, and encourages technology diffusion [13,22,26,40].”