Taxonomic relatedness does not matter for species surrogacy in the assessment of community responses to environmental drivers

By S. Bevilacqua, A. Terlizzi, J. Claudet, Simonetta Fraschetti, F. Boero. 2012

93 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Oceanography

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6a73f8a7361a60cac424d71db775ca9e1792b54b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

1. J. Geist
2. J. Hendricks
3. C. Myers
4. E. Saupe

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. Melanie Mueller
2. Joachim Pander
3. J. Geist
4. J. Hendricks
5. C. Myers
6. E. Saupe

In Oceanography

1. J. Geist

Citations in the corpus

• Taxonomic sufficiency in freshwater ecosystems: effects of taxonomic resolution, functional traits, and data transformation (2013, methodology): “This information is crucial for assessing the applicability of the concept of TS in freshwater ecosystems, e.g., for understanding advantages and limits of using coarser taxonomic resolution than species (Bevilacqua et al. 2012) or functional surrogates instead of classical species data.”
• The Generification of the Fossil Record (2014, background): “…referred to as ‘‘taxonomic sufficiency’’ or ‘‘taxonomic surrogacy’’—is used especially in the field of biomonitoring (using local biota to characterize and monitor environmental conditions) (e.g., Wu 1982; Ellis 1985; Heino and Soininen 2007; Jones 2008; Musco et al. 2009; Bevilacqua et al. 2012).”