Nutritional composition and safety aspects of edible insects.

By B. Rumpold, O. Schlüter. Molecular Nutrition & Food Research, 2013

1,568 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Insect Science, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0133c074b00171ac90c666c1804c099b7fc8e373

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience

1. V. Varelas
2. R. Fitzgerald
3. A. Nongonierma

In Insect Science

1. Diana Bogueva
2. V. Varelas
3. Dora Vasileva Marinova
4. G. Sogari
5. R. Fitzgerald
6. A. Nongonierma

In Social Psychology

1. Diana Bogueva
2. V. Varelas
3. Dora Vasileva Marinova
4. G. Sogari
5. R. Fitzgerald
6. A. Nongonierma

Citations in the corpus

• Nutritional Values and Functional Properties of House Cricket (Acheta domesticus) and Field Cricket (Gryllus bimaculatus) (2019, background): “The variation is due to the orders and species of the insects (van Huis et al. , 2013; Rumpold and Schluter, 2013; Ghosh et al ., 2017).”
• Australian Consumers’ Response to Insects as Food (2019, background): “In general, insects are considered to have several nutritional benefits such as high content of proteins, unsaturated fatty acids, and micronutrients [16], with a considerable nutrient variation depending on the feed composition used during the rearing process [17].”