Social Multi-Criteria Evaluation for a Sustainable Economy

By Giuseppe Munda. 2007

482 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0102eeb8ff3768dadf70ce53002e33b90b0362c6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Citations in the corpus

Measuring energy poverty: Focusing on what matters (2012, unknown): “OPHI Working Paper 42 www.ophi.org.uk 6 In the case of compensatory frameworks, such as additive models, critics argue that using weights to embody intensity of importance represents a theoretical inconsistency (Munda 2008).”
The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Recent Instances for Debate (2013, background): “Besides the cost-effectiveness approach, other possible methodological options that allow a representation of diverse biophysical flows involved would be multi-criteria evaluation (Munda 2008) or other forms of non-monetary assessment, like energy flows accounting.”
The 17 United Nations’ sustainable development goals: a status by 2020 (2021, background): “…overall advantage applying partial ordering is that the possible compensation effects resulting from the aggregation of the single indicator values (Munda 2008) to get a strict linear order, as done by Sachs et al. (2020) is avoided and at the same time the same the role of the single indicators…”
Ethical Considerations in On-Ground Applications of the Ecosystem Services Concept (2012, background): “In many situations, multiple criteria are used to assess choices, even when most stakeholders agree that economic values are a significant element in their decisionmaking process (Munda 2008).”
Ratings and rankings: voodoo or science? (2011, background): “Non-compensatory and non-linear aggregate ranking rules have been advocated by the literature on multicriteria decision making, see for example Billaut et al. (2010), Munda (2008), Munda and Nardo (2009), Balinski and Laraki (2010).”
Social Metabolism, Ecological Distribution Conflicts, and Valuation Languages (2010, background): “1 Resources can be defended without an exclusive appeal to economic valuation, in a participatory multi-criteria framework (Munda, 2008).”
Partial Order Concepts in Applied Sciences (2017, background): “However, such aggregation of the indicators may unequivocally lead to compensation effects where high values in one indicator may compensate low values in another (Munda 2008).”
Soil “Ecosystem” Services and Natural Capital: Critical Appraisal of Research on Uncertain Ground (2016, methodology): “Outranking methods, like NAIADE (Munda, 2008) allow adjustments for the level of compensability of certain criteria.”
Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis and Cost-Benefit Analysis: Comparing alternative frameworks for integrated valuation of ecosystem services (2016, unknown): “However, the tool lacks the possibility to use weights explicitly (Munda 2008).”
The Role of Green Infrastructures in Urban Planning for Climate Change Adaptation (2019, methodology): “The methodology proposed and applied to the green areas of Catania and the planning of investments in GIs, is based on an integrated approach between participatory planning techniques (based on the establishment of focus groups with the various stakeholders) and the NAIADE method (Novel Approach to ”